Development and validation of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) questionnaire on pediatric pain management for physicians and nurses

BACKGROUND: Effective pediatric pain management is often hindered by gaps in medical staff's knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Few reliable instruments comprehensively measure these domains. This study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate a Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Questionnaire on pediatric pain management for physicians and nurses. METHODS: A preliminary pool of items was generated from a literature review and refined through two rounds of Delphi consultations with 19 multidisciplinary experts. A pilot test with 20 physicians and nurses was conducted to ensure clarity. In June 2024, a convenience sample of 603 physicians and nurses from a specialized children's hospital in Chongqing, China, completed the questionnaire for psychometric validation. RESULTS: The final questionnaire comprised 32 items across three dimensions (knowledge: 13; attitudes: 10; practices: 9), a self-report tool using a five-point Likert scale. Items showed good discrimination (CR: 12.29-19.78) and acceptable item-total correlations (r = 0.49-0.72). Content validity indices were high (I-CVI: 0.86-1.00; S-CVI/Ave: 0.996). The overall Cronbach's α was 0.96, with values for the three dimensions ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors explaining 70.56% of the variance (KMO = 0.95; Bartlett's χ² = 12,459.51, p < 0.001), supporting construct validity, and confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure (CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.10, SRMR = 0.06). Convergent validity was supported by average variance extracted values ranging from 0.56 to 0.84. Discriminant validity was established as the square root of the AVE for each factor (knowledge: 0.79; attitudes: 0.92; practices: 0.75) exceeded its inter-factor correlations. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric pain management KAP questionnaire demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in this initial validation. It provides a practical tool to assess physicians' and nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices, supporting the identification of gaps and guiding targeted training and quality improvement initiatives to enhance pediatric pain care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14932-1
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) questionnaire on pediatric pain management for physicians and nurses

Xianlan Zheng, Wenni Zhang, W.T. Liu, Hongyao Leng et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Development and validation of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) questionnaire on pediatric pain management for physicians and nurses

Xianlan Zheng, Wenni Zhang, W.T. Liu, Hongyao Leng, Qiao Shen, Xiaoqiong Wei
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective pediatric pain management is often hindered by gaps in medical staff's knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Few reliable instruments comprehensively measure these domains. This study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate a Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Questionnaire on pediatric pain management for physicians and nurses. METHODS: A preliminary pool of items was generated from a literature review and refined through two rounds of Delphi consultations with 19 multidisciplinary experts. A pilot test with 20 physicians and nurses was conducted to ensure clarity. In June 2024, a convenience sample of 603 physicians and nurses from a specialized children's hospital in Chongqing, China, completed the questionnaire for psychometric validation. RESULTS: The final questionnaire comprised 32 items across three dimensions (knowledge: 13; attitudes: 10; practices: 9), a self-report tool using a five-point Likert scale. Items showed good discrimination (CR: 12.29-19.78) and acceptable item-total correlations (r = 0.49-0.72). Content validity indices were high (I-CVI: 0.86-1.00; S-CVI/Ave: 0.996). The overall Cronbach's α was 0.96, with values for the three dimensions ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors explaining 70.56% of the variance (KMO = 0.95; Bartlett's χ² = 12,459.51, p < 0.001), supporting construct validity, and confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure (CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.10, SRMR = 0.06). Convergent validity was supported by average variance extracted values ranging from 0.56 to 0.84. Discriminant validity was established as the square root of the AVE for each factor (knowledge: 0.79; attitudes: 0.92; practices: 0.75) exceeded its inter-factor correlations. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric pain management KAP questionnaire demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in this initial validation. It provides a practical tool to assess physicians' and nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices, supporting the identification of gaps and guiding targeted training and quality improvement initiatives to enhance pediatric pain care.

BMC Health Services Research
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.