Does timing matter? Comparing pre- and postoperative erector spinae plane blocks in lumbar spine surgery

PURPOSE: Effective analgesia is crucial in lumbar spine surgery. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has emerged as a reliable regional technique; however, the optimal timing of its administration-preoperatively or postoperatively-remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare total 24-hour opioid consumption between preoperative and postoperative ESP block in lumbar spine surgery patients. METHODS: A total of 46 patients aged 18-75 years, classified as ASA physical status I-III and scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, as a randomized, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded trial. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 received an ESP block before surgery, whereas Group 2 received the block after surgery but prior to awakening. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h, quality of recovery assessed with the The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score at 24 h, requirement for additional postoperative analgesia, discharge timing, and the occurrence of adverse effects. RESULTS: Total opioid consumption was comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pain scores at 24 h were slightly lower in Group 2 (p < 0.05), while other time points showed no significant differences. The "comfort" subdomain of QoR-40 was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.05), whereas global QoR-40 scores were similar. No differences were observed in rescue analgesia use, discharge time, or incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Preoperative and postoperative ESP blocks provide comparable analgesia and recovery profiles. Small differences-lower 24-hour pain scores favoring postoperative block and better comfort favoring preoperative block-appear statistically but not clinically significant. Postoperative ESP block may be a practical alternative when preoperative timing is not feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (NCT06215053).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10041-z
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does timing matter? Comparing pre- and postoperative erector spinae plane blocks in lumbar spine surgery

Ferdi Gülaştı, Murat Özcan Yay, Alparslan Turan, Sinem Sarı et al.
European Spine Journal
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Does timing matter? Comparing pre- and postoperative erector spinae plane blocks in lumbar spine surgery

Ferdi Gülaştı, Murat Özcan Yay, Alparslan Turan, Sinem Sarı, Yaşam Umutlu, Didar Kyenshilik, Gul Haney
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Effective analgesia is crucial in lumbar spine surgery. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has emerged as a reliable regional technique; however, the optimal timing of its administration-preoperatively or postoperatively-remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare total 24-hour opioid consumption between preoperative and postoperative ESP block in lumbar spine surgery patients. METHODS: A total of 46 patients aged 18-75 years, classified as ASA physical status I-III and scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, as a randomized, patient- and outcome-assessor-blinded trial. Patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 received an ESP block before surgery, whereas Group 2 received the block after surgery but prior to awakening. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h, quality of recovery assessed with the The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score at 24 h, requirement for additional postoperative analgesia, discharge timing, and the occurrence of adverse effects. RESULTS: Total opioid consumption was comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). Pain scores at 24 h were slightly lower in Group 2 (p < 0.05), while other time points showed no significant differences. The "comfort" subdomain of QoR-40 was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.05), whereas global QoR-40 scores were similar. No differences were observed in rescue analgesia use, discharge time, or incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Preoperative and postoperative ESP blocks provide comparable analgesia and recovery profiles. Small differences-lower 24-hour pain scores favoring postoperative block and better comfort favoring preoperative block-appear statistically but not clinically significant. Postoperative ESP block may be a practical alternative when preoperative timing is not feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (NCT06215053).

European Spine Journal
Ministry of Health (TR), Outcomes Research Consortium (US), University of Houston (US), Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.