Little-f farmer, big-F farmer, or not at all? Questions of identity amongst Australian farming women

Much like other locales, women in Australia have typically not been given formal or informal farmer status. Despite having contributed to farming businesses for decades, their contribution beyond being a “non-productive silent partner” only received formal recognition in the Australian census in 1994. While many in Australia have argued that women should be recognised as farmers, how someone identifies is deeply personal and relates to whether (or not) the individual sees themselves carrying out a particular role or belonging to a particular social group. Drawing from qualitative focus groups with women involved in farming businesses in South Australia, this paper aims to highlight that, despite many women fighting for formal recognition for their involvement in farming businesses, some do not want to assume the identity of ‘farmer’ as they do not subscribe to the associated identity standard. Using identity theory as a lens to analyse qualitative data, I explore how women navigate their own identities in relation to the farm. While they may be identified by others as a farmer, or as a “farmer's wife”, there is observable tension between how others see them and how they see themselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104236
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Little-f farmer, big-F farmer, or not at all? Questions of identity amongst Australian farming women

Emily A. Buddle
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
article

Little-f farmer, big-F farmer, or not at all? Questions of identity amongst Australian farming women

Emily A. Buddle
article en

Abstract

Much like other locales, women in Australia have typically not been given formal or informal farmer status. Despite having contributed to farming businesses for decades, their contribution beyond being a “non-productive silent partner” only received formal recognition in the Australian census in 1994. While many in Australia have argued that women should be recognised as farmers, how someone identifies is deeply personal and relates to whether (or not) the individual sees themselves carrying out a particular role or belonging to a particular social group. Drawing from qualitative focus groups with women involved in farming businesses in South Australia, this paper aims to highlight that, despite many women fighting for formal recognition for their involvement in farming businesses, some do not want to assume the identity of ‘farmer’ as they do not subscribe to the associated identity standard. Using identity theory as a lens to analyse qualitative data, I explore how women navigate their own identities in relation to the farm. While they may be identified by others as a farmer, or as a “farmer's wife”, there is observable tension between how others see them and how they see themselves.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 126
South Australian Research and Development Institute (AU), Wine Australia (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Little-f farmer, big-F farmer, or not at all? Questions of identity amongst Australian farming women — Emily A. Buddle · Journal of Rural Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS