Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a massive open online course for women with breast cancer

Digital health literacy and person-centred care interventions can enhance understanding of online health information and empower patients, optimizing healthcare. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) can provide flexible access and adapted educational resources and are a useful self-care strategy to chronic patients. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the MOOC “Active: Empower Yourself Against Breast Cancer” (original title in Spanish: “Activas: Empodérate frente al cáncer de mama”), developed through a co-creation process involving patients, healthcare professionals, and health science researchers. The course was designed to improve digital health literacy, health literacy, knowledge, self-care, and person-centred care among women at different stages of breast cancer, breast cancer survivors (currently disease-free), and their families/caregivers. Seventy-nine Spanish-speaking participants were recruited using convenience sampling, of whom forty-three completed all MOOC units and assessed its acceptability. Primary outcomes included changes in self-perceived digital health literacy and health literacy after completing the MOOC, measured with the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire–16 items (HLS-EU-Q16). Performance on the knowledge quizzes included in each unit and overall acceptability, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, were also evaluated. Significant improvements were observed in HL (HLS-EU-Q16, p = 0.0027) and DHL (eHEALS, p = 0.0007). The average rating of the MOOC was 8.9 out of 10. Most participants reported high acceptability regarding language, content, relevance, activities, and alignment with the stated objectives. The MOOC appears to be a feasible strategy to improve the digital health literacy, knowledge, self-care, and person-centred care challenges in women with breast cancer, showing high acceptability. Further research with larger and more diverse samples is warranted. The study was retrospectively registered in Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06635239) on October 4th, 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Digital Health
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-026-00274-9
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a massive open online course for women with breast cancer

Yolanda Álvarez‐Pérez, Alezandra Torres‐Castaño, Pepita Giménez-Bonafé, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez et al.
BMC Digital Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a massive open online course for women with breast cancer

Yolanda Álvarez‐Pérez, Alezandra Torres‐Castaño, Pepita Giménez-Bonafé, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Anna Selva-olid, Ana Toledo-Chavarri, Amado Rivero-Santana, Carina González-González, Andrea Duarte-Díaz, Analía Abt-Sacks, Tania Estapé-Madinabeitia, Vanesa Ramos-García
article en

Abstract

Digital health literacy and person-centred care interventions can enhance understanding of online health information and empower patients, optimizing healthcare. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) can provide flexible access and adapted educational resources and are a useful self-care strategy to chronic patients. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the MOOC “Active: Empower Yourself Against Breast Cancer” (original title in Spanish: “Activas: Empodérate frente al cáncer de mama”), developed through a co-creation process involving patients, healthcare professionals, and health science researchers. The course was designed to improve digital health literacy, health literacy, knowledge, self-care, and person-centred care among women at different stages of breast cancer, breast cancer survivors (currently disease-free), and their families/caregivers. Seventy-nine Spanish-speaking participants were recruited using convenience sampling, of whom forty-three completed all MOOC units and assessed its acceptability. Primary outcomes included changes in self-perceived digital health literacy and health literacy after completing the MOOC, measured with the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire–16 items (HLS-EU-Q16). Performance on the knowledge quizzes included in each unit and overall acceptability, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, were also evaluated. Significant improvements were observed in HL (HLS-EU-Q16, p = 0.0027) and DHL (eHEALS, p = 0.0007). The average rating of the MOOC was 8.9 out of 10. Most participants reported high acceptability regarding language, content, relevance, activities, and alignment with the stated objectives. The MOOC appears to be a feasible strategy to improve the digital health literacy, knowledge, self-care, and person-centred care challenges in women with breast cancer, showing high acceptability. Further research with larger and more diverse samples is warranted. The study was retrospectively registered in Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06635239) on October 4th, 2024.

BMC Digital HealthVol. 4(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Fundación Española de la Nutrición (ES), Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (ES), Spanish Clinical Research Network (ES), Department of Physiological Sciences (RU), Servicio Canario de la Salud (ES), Observatorio de la Inmigración de Tenerife (ES), Institute of Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (ES), Institute of Research and Innovation Parc Tauli (ES), Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (ES)
Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.