Form-specific selenium supplementation in poultry: linking bioefficacy to mechanisms and precision applications

Selenium (Se) supplementation in poultry is shifting from deficiency prevention to precision use aimed at measurable improvements in resilience, product quality, and biofortification. Evidence increasingly indicates that, at comparable total dietary Se, bioefficacy varies primarily with chemical form, exposure definition, and retention kinetics. Inorganic salts can correct deficiency and support basal selenoprotein activity, but they provide limited reserve formation. By contrast, selenomethionine (SeMet)-type inputs, including SeMet and OH-SeMet, can build protein-bound Se pools that stabilize Se supply during prolonged stress and are associated with measurable outcomes such as improved feed conversion under heat stress and more predictable egg or tissue enrichment. Biotransformation-derived and engineered systems may provide additional advantages in specific contexts, particularly for mucosal delivery or barrier-related outcomes, but their effects remain strongly product- and formulation-dependent. Mechanistically, source-specific effects reflect differences in Se delivery to selenoprotein synthesis and in the stability of redox and inflammatory control under challenge. A central implication is that matched nominal Se doses do not necessarily represent biologically equivalent exposure, and maximal Se deposition does not necessarily coincide with maximal functional benefit. Thus, deposition targets should be distinguished from functional outcomes such as performance, product quality, and physiological resilience. This review integrates form-specific bioefficacy with mechanistic and application-level evidence and proposes a goal-based precision framework to align Se source and dose with defined production or physiological objectives. Future progress will depend on rigorous source characterization, clearer endpoint alignment, and layered monitoring of exposure, status, and function to enable more predictive and actionable Se use in poultry systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-026-01436-5
Primary Topic
Selenium in Biological Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Form-specific selenium supplementation in poultry: linking bioefficacy to mechanisms and precision applications

Shugeng Wu, Mohamed Shafey Elsharkawy, Uchechukwu Edna Obianwuna, Kai Qiu et al.
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology
Selenium in Biological Systems
article

Form-specific selenium supplementation in poultry: linking bioefficacy to mechanisms and precision applications

Shugeng Wu, Mohamed Shafey Elsharkawy, Uchechukwu Edna Obianwuna, Kai Qiu, V. U. Oleforuh-Okoleh, Jianmin Zhou, Jesse Oluwaseun Ayantoye, Guanghai Qi, Yu Fu, Haijun Zhang
article en

Abstract

Selenium (Se) supplementation in poultry is shifting from deficiency prevention to precision use aimed at measurable improvements in resilience, product quality, and biofortification. Evidence increasingly indicates that, at comparable total dietary Se, bioefficacy varies primarily with chemical form, exposure definition, and retention kinetics. Inorganic salts can correct deficiency and support basal selenoprotein activity, but they provide limited reserve formation. By contrast, selenomethionine (SeMet)-type inputs, including SeMet and OH-SeMet, can build protein-bound Se pools that stabilize Se supply during prolonged stress and are associated with measurable outcomes such as improved feed conversion under heat stress and more predictable egg or tissue enrichment. Biotransformation-derived and engineered systems may provide additional advantages in specific contexts, particularly for mucosal delivery or barrier-related outcomes, but their effects remain strongly product- and formulation-dependent. Mechanistically, source-specific effects reflect differences in Se delivery to selenoprotein synthesis and in the stability of redox and inflammatory control under challenge. A central implication is that matched nominal Se doses do not necessarily represent biologically equivalent exposure, and maximal Se deposition does not necessarily coincide with maximal functional benefit. Thus, deposition targets should be distinguished from functional outcomes such as performance, product quality, and physiological resilience. This review integrates form-specific bioefficacy with mechanistic and application-level evidence and proposes a goal-based precision framework to align Se source and dose with defined production or physiological objectives. Future progress will depend on rigorous source characterization, clearer endpoint alignment, and layered monitoring of exposure, status, and function to enable more predictive and actionable Se use in poultry systems.

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnologyVol. 17(1)
National Research Centre (EG), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Feed Research Institute (CN), Institute of Animal Sciences (CN), Rivers State University (NG)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Selenium in Biological Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.