Genomic features do not account for differences in multiple myeloma risk by ancestry

Studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the contribution of germline variants or somatic genomic drivers to racial disparities in multiple myeloma (MM). To comprehensively investigate somatic drivers in relation to inherited genetics in MM, we combined newly sequenced whole-genome sequencing data with publicly available datasets (total n = 1,286). Overall, we did not identify germline or somatic genomic differences that explain the different risk of developing MM between patients with genetic similarity to African (AFR) or European (EUR) reference populations. A difference in the detectability and timing of APOBEC-associated and germinal center mutational activity was observed. Integrating epidemiological data and mutational signature-based temporal estimates, we challenge the assumption that individuals in the AFR group develop MM at a younger age. Finally, we demonstrate that, with equal access to efficacious therapies, patients in the AFR and EUR groups have equivalent clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Discovery
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-25-0259
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic features do not account for differences in multiple myeloma risk by ancestry

Benjamin T. Diamond, Zoe Steinsnyder, Kylee H. Maclachlan, Saad Z. Usmani et al.
Blood Cancer Discovery
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Genomic features do not account for differences in multiple myeloma risk by ancestry

Benjamin T. Diamond, Zoe Steinsnyder, Kylee H. Maclachlan, Saad Z. Usmani, Tala Shekarkhand, Eileen M. Boyle, Malin L. Hultcrantz, Urvi Ashok Shah, Hongwei Tang, Ahmet Doǧan, Nicolas Robine, Dylan Gagler, Alexander M. Lesokhin, Faith E. Davies, Linda Banovic Baughn, Timothy R. Chu, Zalman Vaksman, Bachisio Ziccheddu, Elizabeth Brown, Yanming Zhang, Niels Weinhold, Patrick Blaney, Hani Hassoun, Sham Mailankody, Neha Korde, Marios Papadimitriou, Marc S. Raab, Ola Landgren, Huihuang Yan, Carlyn Rose C. Tan, Francesco Maura, Gareth J. Morgan, Lara Winterkorn, Robert Cimera, Alexandra M. Poos
article en

Abstract

Studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the contribution of germline variants or somatic genomic drivers to racial disparities in multiple myeloma (MM). To comprehensively investigate somatic drivers in relation to inherited genetics in MM, we combined newly sequenced whole-genome sequencing data with publicly available datasets (total n = 1,286). Overall, we did not identify germline or somatic genomic differences that explain the different risk of developing MM between patients with genetic similarity to African (AFR) or European (EUR) reference populations. A difference in the detectability and timing of APOBEC-associated and germinal center mutational activity was observed. Integrating epidemiological data and mutational signature-based temporal estimates, we challenge the assumption that individuals in the AFR group develop MM at a younger age. Finally, we demonstrate that, with equal access to efficacious therapies, patients in the AFR and EUR groups have equivalent clinical outcomes.

Blood Cancer Discovery
Mayo Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), NYU Langone Health (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL), The London College (GB), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), New York Genome Center (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University College London (GB), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.