American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom

The removal of researchers from a conference for handing out a paper criticising the US administration represents further political encroachment on science and freedom of speech, writes David Nathan

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-555118
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom

David M. Nathan
BMJ
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom

David M. Nathan
article en

Abstract

The removal of researchers from a conference for handing out a paper criticising the US administration represents further political encroachment on science and freedom of speech, writes David Nathan

BMJVol. 393
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

American Diabetes Association controversy: Activism is necessary to protect scientific freedom — David M. Nathan · BMJ (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS