Cost-effectiveness and Digital Personalised Learning: Three interventions from Kenya

<ns3:p>Recently there has been a significant shift towards better understanding the relative cost-effectiveness of education interventions, particularly those implemented in LMICs. Work to group similar interventions has added value in identifying the types of programmes and forms of technology likely to deliver cost-effective improvements in learning outcomes. However, this framing relies on assumptions that programmes within the same category will have similar cost-effectiveness and be broadly similar in how they are implemented. Furthermore, it overlooks the key issue that individual programme features and their contextual implementation are consequential to cost-effectiveness. One category that has gained attention in recent years is Digital Personalised Learning (DPL) - a category that is difficult to define due to the variety of mechanisms through which learning can be personalised. As a result, it can be problematic to assume that the features and cost-effectiveness of DPL programmes can be compared and grouped, limiting conclusions about DPL as a category. This lack of consistency is emphasised by the absence of a universally agreed definition of DPL. Therefore, for understanding cost-effectiveness, it may be less useful to categorise all interventions with a personalisation element as comparable. In this paper, we use three examples of DPL interventions in Kenya to undertake an in-depth analysis of their features and implications for cost-effectiveness. By analysing key differences in implementation models, costs, and learning outcomes, this paper highlights significant variation in how DPL programmes achieve impact. It argues that superficial comparisons of cost-effectiveness may miss important information for decision-makers and educators comparing DPL options. As a result, DPL interventions should not be conceptualised as a single, discrete category when illustrating the cost-effectiveness of groups of interventions.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179721.1
Primary Topic
ICT in Developing Communities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness and Digital Personalised Learning: Three interventions from Kenya

Jonny D’Rozario, Joel Mitchell
F1000Research
ICT in Developing Communities
article

Cost-effectiveness and Digital Personalised Learning: Three interventions from Kenya

Jonny D’Rozario, Joel Mitchell
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Recently there has been a significant shift towards better understanding the relative cost-effectiveness of education interventions, particularly those implemented in LMICs. Work to group similar interventions has added value in identifying the types of programmes and forms of technology likely to deliver cost-effective improvements in learning outcomes. However, this framing relies on assumptions that programmes within the same category will have similar cost-effectiveness and be broadly similar in how they are implemented. Furthermore, it overlooks the key issue that individual programme features and their contextual implementation are consequential to cost-effectiveness. One category that has gained attention in recent years is Digital Personalised Learning (DPL) - a category that is difficult to define due to the variety of mechanisms through which learning can be personalised. As a result, it can be problematic to assume that the features and cost-effectiveness of DPL programmes can be compared and grouped, limiting conclusions about DPL as a category. This lack of consistency is emphasised by the absence of a universally agreed definition of DPL. Therefore, for understanding cost-effectiveness, it may be less useful to categorise all interventions with a personalisation element as comparable. In this paper, we use three examples of DPL interventions in Kenya to undertake an in-depth analysis of their features and implications for cost-effectiveness. By analysing key differences in implementation models, costs, and learning outcomes, this paper highlights significant variation in how DPL programmes achieve impact. It argues that superficial comparisons of cost-effectiveness may miss important information for decision-makers and educators comparing DPL options. As a result, DPL interventions should not be conceptualised as a single, discrete category when illustrating the cost-effectiveness of groups of interventions.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Sciencetech (Canada) (CA)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
ICT in Developing Communities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.