A comparative study of content areas in education for sustainability in eco- and non-eco-certified preschools in Sweden

Content areas in education for sustainability can be defined as the domain of knowledge and skills that are crucial for laying the foundation for children’s understanding of sustainability practices. This study explored and compared the integration of sustainability-related content areas in the teaching practices of 25 eco-certified and 25 non-eco-certified preschools across 25 municipalities in Sweden. Cross-sectional data on sustainability-related teaching practices were collected from 322 teachers using an open-ended questionnaire. An interpretative content analysis was used. Qualitative responses were analyzed using the OMEP ESD Rating Scale, while quantitative data were processed with IBM SPSS Statistics. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The results showed that the preschool teachers addressed economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainability. Commonly used content areas in education for sustainability were waste sorting and recycling, guardianship (nature stewardship), cultivation, social and cultural diversity, and equity and equality. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between eco- and non-eco-certified preschools in terms of the number of content areas addressed. However, teachers from eco-certified preschools demonstrated higher-quality responses in one of the 12 content areas: waste sorting and recycling. The findings indicate that teachers engage more strongly with the economic and social dimensions of sustainability. These findings of this study differ from previous research, likely because the present study classifies waste sorting and recycling as economic sustainability rather than environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2026.2687168
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of content areas in education for sustainability in eco- and non-eco-certified preschools in Sweden

Ingrid Engdahl, Johan Borg, Farhana Borg, Ingrid Pramling Samuelsson
Cogent Education
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

A comparative study of content areas in education for sustainability in eco- and non-eco-certified preschools in Sweden

Ingrid Engdahl, Johan Borg, Farhana Borg, Ingrid Pramling Samuelsson
article en

Abstract

Content areas in education for sustainability can be defined as the domain of knowledge and skills that are crucial for laying the foundation for children’s understanding of sustainability practices. This study explored and compared the integration of sustainability-related content areas in the teaching practices of 25 eco-certified and 25 non-eco-certified preschools across 25 municipalities in Sweden. Cross-sectional data on sustainability-related teaching practices were collected from 322 teachers using an open-ended questionnaire. An interpretative content analysis was used. Qualitative responses were analyzed using the OMEP ESD Rating Scale, while quantitative data were processed with IBM SPSS Statistics. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The results showed that the preschool teachers addressed economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainability. Commonly used content areas in education for sustainability were waste sorting and recycling, guardianship (nature stewardship), cultivation, social and cultural diversity, and equity and equality. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between eco- and non-eco-certified preschools in terms of the number of content areas addressed. However, teachers from eco-certified preschools demonstrated higher-quality responses in one of the 12 content areas: waste sorting and recycling. The findings indicate that teachers engage more strongly with the economic and social dimensions of sustainability. These findings of this study differ from previous research, likely because the present study classifies waste sorting and recycling as economic sustainability rather than environmental sustainability.

Cogent EducationVol. 13(1)
Dalarna University (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Institute of Psychology and Pedagogy (RU), Mälardalen University (SE), Youth Development (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.