Restoring neuroplasticity after CNS trauma: cell therapy approaches in spinal cord and traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND: The central nervous system (CNS) has a limited regenerative capacity, rendering traumatic injuries such as spinal cord injury (SCI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) highly disabling and difficult to treat. These insults trigger complex pathophysiological cascades, including extensive cell death, sustained inflammation, and the formation of a hostile inhibitory microenvironment that compromises neural plasticity and hampers tissue regeneration. The multifactorial nature of these mechanisms, together with a fragmented understanding of CNS plasticity, has hindered the development of effective therapeutic interventions. MAIN BODY: In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as promising strategies to support neural repair and induce pro-regenerative processes. This approach encompasses multiple cell types, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs), as well as neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs). Clinical studies in SCI have reported functional improvements, particularly following treatment with BMSCs and peripheral blood-derived stem cells, although substantial methodological heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions. In TBI, clinical evidence remains more limited; however, preclinical studies consistently demonstrate the neuroprotective and regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies. Beyond direct cell transplantation, increasing attention has been given to cell-free approaches, including secretome and extracellular vesicle-based strategies, which recapitulate many of the beneficial effects while potentially overcoming safety and logistical constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both cell-based and cell-free therapeutic strategies show significant potential to enhance neuroplasticity, attenuate secondary injury, and promote functional recovery following CNS trauma. Nevertheless, successful clinical translation will require larger, well-controlled trials and the establishment of standardized protocols addressing optimal timing, dosage, and routes of administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-07933-5
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoring neuroplasticity after CNS trauma: cell therapy approaches in spinal cord and traumatic brain injury

Jonas Campos, M aacute rio LIMA, Belém Sampaio‐Marques, Ana T. Palha et al.
Journal of Translational Medicine
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

Restoring neuroplasticity after CNS trauma: cell therapy approaches in spinal cord and traumatic brain injury

Jonas Campos, M aacute rio LIMA, Belém Sampaio‐Marques, Ana T. Palha, António J. Salgado, Melyssa Carvalho
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The central nervous system (CNS) has a limited regenerative capacity, rendering traumatic injuries such as spinal cord injury (SCI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) highly disabling and difficult to treat. These insults trigger complex pathophysiological cascades, including extensive cell death, sustained inflammation, and the formation of a hostile inhibitory microenvironment that compromises neural plasticity and hampers tissue regeneration. The multifactorial nature of these mechanisms, together with a fragmented understanding of CNS plasticity, has hindered the development of effective therapeutic interventions. MAIN BODY: In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as promising strategies to support neural repair and induce pro-regenerative processes. This approach encompasses multiple cell types, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs), as well as neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs). Clinical studies in SCI have reported functional improvements, particularly following treatment with BMSCs and peripheral blood-derived stem cells, although substantial methodological heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions. In TBI, clinical evidence remains more limited; however, preclinical studies consistently demonstrate the neuroprotective and regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies. Beyond direct cell transplantation, increasing attention has been given to cell-free approaches, including secretome and extracellular vesicle-based strategies, which recapitulate many of the beneficial effects while potentially overcoming safety and logistical constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both cell-based and cell-free therapeutic strategies show significant potential to enhance neuroplasticity, attenuate secondary injury, and promote functional recovery following CNS trauma. Nevertheless, successful clinical translation will require larger, well-controlled trials and the establishment of standardized protocols addressing optimal timing, dosage, and routes of administration.

Journal of Translational Medicine
University of Minho (PT)
Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Norte, Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.