Is Vaginal Estrogen Treatment Associated with Risk of Thrombosis in Postmenopausal Women? A Scoping Review

Abstract Although the thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogen is recognized, the risk profile of vaginal estrogen treatment remains inconclusive. This scoping review aims to explore available evidence on the association between vaginal estrogen treatment in postmenopausal women and the risk of thrombosis. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Embase, investigating vaginal estrogen treatment and thrombosis, for all records up to May 21, 2025. The process was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and a preregistered protocol (osf.io/hgecd). We excluded systemic estrogen treatments, contraception, fertility treatments, gender-affirming therapies, and hormone treatments other than estrogen. Eligible study designs included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, observational, case–control, and cohort studies. The search identified 866 articles, whereof 8 were eligible. Manual searching through citations and references yielded 3 additional studies, resulting in 11 included articles, all observational. One study reported a reduced risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) following discontinuation of vaginal estrogen treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.34–0.86]). Remaining studies found no thrombosis risk in vaginal estrogen users. For venous thromboembolism (n = 6), effect estimates ranged from null to reduced risk (aHRs: 0.68 [0.36–1.28], to 1.06 [0.58–1.93]), similar for MI (n = 5; aHRs: 0.52 [0.31–0.85] to 0.83 [0.77–0.89]) and stroke (n = 6, aHRs: 0.68 [0.62–0.70] to 0.96 [0.93–0.99]). This scoping review, including studies of generally moderate to high methodological quality, indicates no increased risk of thrombosis associated with vaginal estrogen use in postmenopausal women. Further prospective, high-quality clinical trials, including high-risk populations and women with prior thrombosis, are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2882-1241
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Vaginal Estrogen Treatment Associated with Risk of Thrombosis in Postmenopausal Women? A Scoping Review

Pınar Bor, Mustafa Vakur Bor, Marianne Glavind‐Kristensen, Sofie L. Juul
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Is Vaginal Estrogen Treatment Associated with Risk of Thrombosis in Postmenopausal Women? A Scoping Review

Pınar Bor, Mustafa Vakur Bor, Marianne Glavind‐Kristensen, Sofie L. Juul
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although the thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogen is recognized, the risk profile of vaginal estrogen treatment remains inconclusive. This scoping review aims to explore available evidence on the association between vaginal estrogen treatment in postmenopausal women and the risk of thrombosis. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Embase, investigating vaginal estrogen treatment and thrombosis, for all records up to May 21, 2025. The process was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and a preregistered protocol (osf.io/hgecd). We excluded systemic estrogen treatments, contraception, fertility treatments, gender-affirming therapies, and hormone treatments other than estrogen. Eligible study designs included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, observational, case–control, and cohort studies. The search identified 866 articles, whereof 8 were eligible. Manual searching through citations and references yielded 3 additional studies, resulting in 11 included articles, all observational. One study reported a reduced risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) following discontinuation of vaginal estrogen treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.34–0.86]). Remaining studies found no thrombosis risk in vaginal estrogen users. For venous thromboembolism (n = 6), effect estimates ranged from null to reduced risk (aHRs: 0.68 [0.36–1.28], to 1.06 [0.58–1.93]), similar for MI (n = 5; aHRs: 0.52 [0.31–0.85] to 0.83 [0.77–0.89]) and stroke (n = 6, aHRs: 0.68 [0.62–0.70] to 0.96 [0.93–0.99]). This scoping review, including studies of generally moderate to high methodological quality, indicates no increased risk of thrombosis associated with vaginal estrogen use in postmenopausal women. Further prospective, high-quality clinical trials, including high-risk populations and women with prior thrombosis, are warranted.

Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
University College South Denmark (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Region of Southern Denmark (DK), Central Denmark Region (DK), Hospital South West Jutland (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.