EXPRESS: Are Buyers Strategic in Online B2B Reviews?

While online reviews are critical in e-commerce, the strategic behavior of reviewers is understudied, especially in business-to-business (B2B) markets. We investigate buyers' strategic behaviors when leaving reviews: whether B2B buyers withhold reviews from high-performing suppliers to temper their growth and maintain future bargaining power. We collect the entire review and transaction histories of 4,605 suppliers on Alibaba.com, the largest B2B global sourcing platform, covering 62,529 reviews and 455,593 transactions from February to November in 2017 and 2018. To identify causal effects, we employ a generalized difference-in-differences approach exploiting the 2018 US-China trade war as a natural experiment. This event created a sudden and exogenous shock to supplier transaction volumes, allowing us to measure the response of non-US buyers to changes in supplier performance. We find strong evidence of strategic review withholding. A one-unit increase in a supplier's transaction volume significantly reduces a buyer's probability of leaving a review by 0.9 percentage points. We also find no effect on the numerical ratings and sentiment of reviews that are posted. This indicates that buyers respond to a supplier's success by withholding reviews, but they do not harm the seller's reputation by leaving negative reviews. This core mechanism was directly confirmed by a comprehensive survey we conducted with B2B professionals. Our findings demonstrate that B2B buyers act as strategic agents who manipulate information for competitive advantage. This presents a crucial insight for platform governance: information transparency is a double-edged sword. While intended to reduce information asymmetry, publicly disclosing performance metrics like transaction histories can enable strategic behavior that distorts the reputation system. Platforms must therefore balance the benefits of transparency against the potential for such strategic manipulation when designing their information disclosure policies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Production and Operations Management
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478261461916
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Are Buyers Strategic in Online B2B Reviews?

Ruomeng Cui, Achal Bassamboo, Mor Armony, Hao Ding
Production and Operations Management
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

EXPRESS: Are Buyers Strategic in Online B2B Reviews?

Ruomeng Cui, Achal Bassamboo, Mor Armony, Hao Ding
article en

Abstract

While online reviews are critical in e-commerce, the strategic behavior of reviewers is understudied, especially in business-to-business (B2B) markets. We investigate buyers' strategic behaviors when leaving reviews: whether B2B buyers withhold reviews from high-performing suppliers to temper their growth and maintain future bargaining power. We collect the entire review and transaction histories of 4,605 suppliers on Alibaba.com, the largest B2B global sourcing platform, covering 62,529 reviews and 455,593 transactions from February to November in 2017 and 2018. To identify causal effects, we employ a generalized difference-in-differences approach exploiting the 2018 US-China trade war as a natural experiment. This event created a sudden and exogenous shock to supplier transaction volumes, allowing us to measure the response of non-US buyers to changes in supplier performance. We find strong evidence of strategic review withholding. A one-unit increase in a supplier's transaction volume significantly reduces a buyer's probability of leaving a review by 0.9 percentage points. We also find no effect on the numerical ratings and sentiment of reviews that are posted. This indicates that buyers respond to a supplier's success by withholding reviews, but they do not harm the seller's reputation by leaving negative reviews. This core mechanism was directly confirmed by a comprehensive survey we conducted with B2B professionals. Our findings demonstrate that B2B buyers act as strategic agents who manipulate information for competitive advantage. This presents a crucial insight for platform governance: information transparency is a double-edged sword. While intended to reduce information asymmetry, publicly disclosing performance metrics like transaction histories can enable strategic behavior that distorts the reputation system. Platforms must therefore balance the benefits of transparency against the potential for such strategic manipulation when designing their information disclosure policies.

Production and Operations Management
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EXPRESS: Are Buyers Strategic in Online B2B Reviews? — Ruomeng Cui, Achal Bassamboo, et al. · Production and Operations Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS