Operationalizing Social Contracts: A New Measurement of Government Deliverables

Abstract The international development debate is increasingly referring to the notion of the “social contract”. In this paper, we measure what governments give societies, a core element of social contracts. To enable social contract comparison across countries and over time, we develop indices to capture the three “Ps”: protection against internal and external threats, provision of social and economic services, and political participation . These indices are composed of indicators, which are mainly input variables to gauge the willingness of governments to deliver the three Ps. Subsequently, we calculate the values of 154 countries for the three indices around the year 2019. The results show that the indices are useful and valid. They highly correlate with each other and with other indicators such as per capita income and the Human Development Index. Yet, these correlations are not perfect, meaning that the indices are not another redundant development index. They add information and value. Finally, we make a first step in identifying patterns in the results. Countries in Latin America were doing comparatively well on average in terms of political participation in 2019. When controlling for per capita income, governments in sub-Saharan Africa, were delivering disproportionately more on average in terms of protection and political participation , but less so in terms of provision . Countries in the Middle East and North Africa fail mainly with regard to political participation .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Comparative International Development
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-026-09504-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalizing Social Contracts: A New Measurement of Government Deliverables

Markus Loewe, Amirah El-Haddad, Tina Zintl
1 citations
Studies in Comparative International Development
Human Rights and Development
31.22
article

Operationalizing Social Contracts: A New Measurement of Government Deliverables

Markus Loewe, Amirah El-Haddad, Tina Zintl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The international development debate is increasingly referring to the notion of the “social contract”. In this paper, we measure what governments give societies, a core element of social contracts. To enable social contract comparison across countries and over time, we develop indices to capture the three “Ps”: protection against internal and external threats, provision of social and economic services, and political participation . These indices are composed of indicators, which are mainly input variables to gauge the willingness of governments to deliver the three Ps. Subsequently, we calculate the values of 154 countries for the three indices around the year 2019. The results show that the indices are useful and valid. They highly correlate with each other and with other indicators such as per capita income and the Human Development Index. Yet, these correlations are not perfect, meaning that the indices are not another redundant development index. They add information and value. Finally, we make a first step in identifying patterns in the results. Countries in Latin America were doing comparatively well on average in terms of political participation in 2019. When controlling for per capita income, governments in sub-Saharan Africa, were delivering disproportionately more on average in terms of protection and political participation , but less so in terms of provision . Countries in the Middle East and North Africa fail mainly with regard to political participation .

Studies in Comparative International Development
German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Human Rights and Development
31.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.