Patient Perspectives in Cardiovascular Research: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Trust, and Strategies for Inclusive Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND: Women, Black, and Hispanic patients bear a disproportionate burden of cardiovascular disease yet remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Understanding patient perspectives is essential to developing inclusive recruitment strategies in cardiovascular research. METHODS: The RECHARGE trial (Revascularization Choices Among Underrepresented Groups Evaluation) is an ongoing comparative effectiveness study comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting among women, Black, and Hispanic patients. To inform recruitment strategies, we conducted a qualitative study using in-person and virtual focus groups and semistructured interviews. Participants were US adults who identified as Black or Hispanic and had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or advanced cardiovascular disease. Interviews were guided by the Social-Ecological Model and analyzed using directed content analysis with a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: The sample included 42 participants (35 women, 7 men); 29 identified as Hispanic and 13 as Black. Barriers and facilitators to trial participation spanned multiple levels of the Social-Ecological Model. At the individual and interpersonal levels, barriers included complex study materials, excessive medical jargon, and mistrust of randomization, with concerns about being assigned a less effective treatment. At community and societal levels, participants cited limited recruitment outreach, lack of culturally and linguistically appropriate materials, and mistrust stemming from historical research injustices. Facilitators included trust in healthcare providers, reassurance regarding treatment appropriateness, and involvement of family or support systems. At the community and societal levels, accessible, visual, and multilingual materials were highlighted to support understanding. Participants emphasized the value of plain language, visual, and multilingual materials, adequate time for shared decision-making, and transparent communication about study goals. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing representation of underrepresented populations in cardiovascular trials requires transparent, accessible communication and trust-centered recruitment strategies. Leveraging trusted healthcare providers and community-based outreach is critical to advancing equity in cardiovascular research. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT06399705 and NCT06399692.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.125.012189
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Perspectives in Cardiovascular Research: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Trust, and Strategies for Inclusive Clinical Trials

Stephanie Niño de Rivera, John A. Spertus, Aminah Sallam, Patrick O. Gee et al.
1 citations
Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Ethics in Clinical Research
16.42
article

Patient Perspectives in Cardiovascular Research: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Trust, and Strategies for Inclusive Clinical Trials

Stephanie Niño de Rivera, John A. Spertus, Aminah Sallam, Patrick O. Gee, Ruth Masterson Creber, Björn Redfors, Rhonda E. Monroe, Clyde W. Yancy, Niurka Suero-Tejeda, Gregg W. Stone, Mario Gaudino, Sarah Eslami, Matthew Tang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women, Black, and Hispanic patients bear a disproportionate burden of cardiovascular disease yet remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Understanding patient perspectives is essential to developing inclusive recruitment strategies in cardiovascular research. METHODS: The RECHARGE trial (Revascularization Choices Among Underrepresented Groups Evaluation) is an ongoing comparative effectiveness study comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting among women, Black, and Hispanic patients. To inform recruitment strategies, we conducted a qualitative study using in-person and virtual focus groups and semistructured interviews. Participants were US adults who identified as Black or Hispanic and had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or advanced cardiovascular disease. Interviews were guided by the Social-Ecological Model and analyzed using directed content analysis with a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: The sample included 42 participants (35 women, 7 men); 29 identified as Hispanic and 13 as Black. Barriers and facilitators to trial participation spanned multiple levels of the Social-Ecological Model. At the individual and interpersonal levels, barriers included complex study materials, excessive medical jargon, and mistrust of randomization, with concerns about being assigned a less effective treatment. At community and societal levels, participants cited limited recruitment outreach, lack of culturally and linguistically appropriate materials, and mistrust stemming from historical research injustices. Facilitators included trust in healthcare providers, reassurance regarding treatment appropriateness, and involvement of family or support systems. At the community and societal levels, accessible, visual, and multilingual materials were highlighted to support understanding. Participants emphasized the value of plain language, visual, and multilingual materials, adequate time for shared decision-making, and transparent communication about study goals. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing representation of underrepresented populations in cardiovascular trials requires transparent, accessible communication and trust-centered recruitment strategies. Leveraging trusted healthcare providers and community-based outreach is critical to advancing equity in cardiovascular research. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT06399705 and NCT06399692.

Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Northwestern University (US), Cornell University (US), Health Innovations (United States) (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute (US), Chesterfield County Public Library (US), Optimal Solutions (United States) (US), Columbia University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics in Clinical Research
16.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.