The power and pitfalls of constructive journalism: The effects of hopeful narratives in the news on attitudes, engagement and knowledge

Recent research has argued that constructive journalism, which presents negative news by focusing on positive values and solutions, may reduce audiences’ tendency to avoid news without sacrificing perceived news credibility. This study uses a between-subjects experimental design ( N = 1011) to examine in greater nuance the psychological outcomes of constructive narratives highlighting the protagonist’s hope in face of adversity. Our respondents reported more positive emotions in the hopeful protagonist condition (compared with the despairing protagonist), but they also perceived the government as less responsible for the situation and reported lower levels of support for necessary policy changes. They also gained less information from the story. We consider the implications of these findings for the watchdog role of journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261459540
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power and pitfalls of constructive journalism: The effects of hopeful narratives in the news on attitudes, engagement and knowledge

Yariv Tsfati, Oren Livio, Rebecca Tukachinsky Forster, Nurit Tal‐Or et al.
Journalism
Media Influence and Health
article

The power and pitfalls of constructive journalism: The effects of hopeful narratives in the news on attitudes, engagement and knowledge

Yariv Tsfati, Oren Livio, Rebecca Tukachinsky Forster, Nurit Tal‐Or, Liran Peretz, Yael Ella-Hay
article en

Abstract

Recent research has argued that constructive journalism, which presents negative news by focusing on positive values and solutions, may reduce audiences’ tendency to avoid news without sacrificing perceived news credibility. This study uses a between-subjects experimental design ( N = 1011) to examine in greater nuance the psychological outcomes of constructive narratives highlighting the protagonist’s hope in face of adversity. Our respondents reported more positive emotions in the hopeful protagonist condition (compared with the despairing protagonist), but they also perceived the government as less responsible for the situation and reported lower levels of support for necessary policy changes. They also gained less information from the story. We consider the implications of these findings for the watchdog role of journalism.

Journalism
Chapman University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), University of Haifa (IL)
Israel Science Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The power and pitfalls of constructive journalism: The effects of hopeful narratives in the news on attitudes, engagement and knowledge — Yariv Tsfati, Oren Livio, et al. · Journalism (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS