Overcoming Impediments to the Qualification of Additively Manufactured Polymer Components: The Case of ULTEM

The qualification of additively manufactured (AM) components produced from engineering polymers poses unique challenges, particularly when evaluating mechanical properties according to ASTM D638. The application of high-performance thermoplastics, such as ULTEM™ 9085 and ULTEM™ 1010, frequently relies on manufacturer-provided datasheets for qualification. However, existing datasheets do not provide guidance specific to articles printed in the XY plane, which can be complicated by failures that initiate at microstructural anomalies rather than being driven by intrinsic material behavior. The objective of this study was to investigate the performance and qualification of ULTEM 9085™, examined according to ASTM D638, and pursue improvements through refined print parameters. A significant improvement in strength and conforming failures was achieved with modest adjustments to the print settings. For Type 1 samples printed with ±45° infill, gage section failures improved from only 5% to 100%, while samples with 0/90° infill achieved 80%. Correspondingly, the ultimate tensile strength increased from 49 ± 2 MPa to 61 ± 2 MPa and from 53 ± 3 MPa to 63 ± 6 MPa, respectively. These results underscore the critical role of process parameters, including contour overlap, in qualifying polymer AM materials, and their contribution to the performance and reliability of printed components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18121477
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overcoming Impediments to the Qualification of Additively Manufactured Polymer Components: The Case of ULTEM

Dwayne Arola, Vanessa Bradshaw, Colin Marquis, Mark Sorna et al.
Polymers
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Overcoming Impediments to the Qualification of Additively Manufactured Polymer Components: The Case of ULTEM

Dwayne Arola, Vanessa Bradshaw, Colin Marquis, Mark Sorna, Ellen Ma, Anushka Sarode, Megan Hong, Lars Glaesner
article en

Abstract

The qualification of additively manufactured (AM) components produced from engineering polymers poses unique challenges, particularly when evaluating mechanical properties according to ASTM D638. The application of high-performance thermoplastics, such as ULTEM™ 9085 and ULTEM™ 1010, frequently relies on manufacturer-provided datasheets for qualification. However, existing datasheets do not provide guidance specific to articles printed in the XY plane, which can be complicated by failures that initiate at microstructural anomalies rather than being driven by intrinsic material behavior. The objective of this study was to investigate the performance and qualification of ULTEM 9085™, examined according to ASTM D638, and pursue improvements through refined print parameters. A significant improvement in strength and conforming failures was achieved with modest adjustments to the print settings. For Type 1 samples printed with ±45° infill, gage section failures improved from only 5% to 100%, while samples with 0/90° infill achieved 80%. Correspondingly, the ultimate tensile strength increased from 49 ± 2 MPa to 61 ± 2 MPa and from 53 ± 3 MPa to 63 ± 6 MPa, respectively. These results underscore the critical role of process parameters, including contour overlap, in qualifying polymer AM materials, and their contribution to the performance and reliability of printed components.

PolymersVol. 18(12)
University of Washington (US), Naval Undersea Warfare Center (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.