Implementation and evaluation of the multidisciplinary “ABCDEF of sleep” protocol in Brazilian intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study. Results of a two-phase

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disruption is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and is associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated whether a multidisciplinary sleep protocol improves subjective sleep quality in critically ill patients. METHODS: This multicenter quasi-experimental before-after study (2022-2024) was conducted in two Brazilian ICUs. Adult patients with an ICU stay of ≥2 nights were included. Sleep was assessed using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) and the Sleep in the ICU Questionnaire (SICUQ). Following baseline assessment, structured training and a multifaceted "ABCDEF of Sleep" protocol were implemented. The primary outcome was the global RCSQ score; secondary outcomes included SICUQ domains and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included (control = 61; intervention = 51). The primary outcome (aggregated 3-night RCSQ score) did not differ between groups (p = 0.31). In per-night analyses, RCSQ scores were higher on the second night in the intervention group (p = 0.008), with no differences on nights 1 or 3. The intervention improved perceived sleep quality and reduced environmental disturbances (p ≤ 0.001), without effects on mortality, mechanical ventilation, or length of stay. Family-reported sleep perception did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A pragmatic sleep protocol improved subjective sleep quality and reduced environmental disturbances in ICU patients, but did not impact major clinical outcomes. Larger studies using objective measures are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Care
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2026.155649
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation and evaluation of the multidisciplinary “ABCDEF of sleep” protocol in Brazilian intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study. Results of a two-phase

Andressa dos Santos Gomes, Sarah Benedetti Custódio da Silva, Mariana Mattioni, Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer Neto et al.
Journal of Critical Care
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Implementation and evaluation of the multidisciplinary “ABCDEF of sleep” protocol in Brazilian intensive care units: A quasi-experimental study. Results of a two-phase

Andressa dos Santos Gomes, Sarah Benedetti Custódio da Silva, Mariana Mattioni, Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer Neto, L Madeira, Henrique Mezzomo Pasqual, ISABEL CRISTINA FELTES, Pauline Eloise Mariani, Diogo Bolsson de Moraes Rocha, Bárbara Rayanne Fior, Laura Drehmer, Tiago Fiabane Paviani, Anielle Ferrazza, Fabrícia Lúcia Loeblein Soares, Cassiano Teixeira, Bruna Mirley Cavalcante Barreto Reinheimer, Felipe Cerbaro Viana, Cleide Geittenes Albino, Carlos Francisco Pereira do Bem
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disruption is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and is associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated whether a multidisciplinary sleep protocol improves subjective sleep quality in critically ill patients. METHODS: This multicenter quasi-experimental before-after study (2022-2024) was conducted in two Brazilian ICUs. Adult patients with an ICU stay of ≥2 nights were included. Sleep was assessed using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) and the Sleep in the ICU Questionnaire (SICUQ). Following baseline assessment, structured training and a multifaceted "ABCDEF of Sleep" protocol were implemented. The primary outcome was the global RCSQ score; secondary outcomes included SICUQ domains and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included (control = 61; intervention = 51). The primary outcome (aggregated 3-night RCSQ score) did not differ between groups (p = 0.31). In per-night analyses, RCSQ scores were higher on the second night in the intervention group (p = 0.008), with no differences on nights 1 or 3. The intervention improved perceived sleep quality and reduced environmental disturbances (p ≤ 0.001), without effects on mortality, mechanical ventilation, or length of stay. Family-reported sleep perception did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A pragmatic sleep protocol improved subjective sleep quality and reduced environmental disturbances in ICU patients, but did not impact major clinical outcomes. Larger studies using objective measures are needed.

Journal of Critical CareVol. 95
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR), Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.