Do modes of presence matter? regulation and participation in graduate students’ hybrid synchronous group-based collaboration

STRUCTURED Abstract Background Synchronous hybrid education offers flexibility and accessibility, but can also pose challenges for students in regulating group work and ensuring equal participation in collaborative activities. Understanding how students address the challenges of regulation and participation in hybrid collaboration settings is critical for designing and supporting students for hybrid education. Aims This exploratory study examines how regulation strategies and verbal participation manifest across online and physical modes of presence in a collaborative project, and how students address challenges that emerge during hybrid synchronous group work. Sample Four graduate-level student groups (16 students) participating in a 14-week hybrid legal education course. Methods A multimodal exploratory mixed-methods approach combining Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), speaking time analysis, and qualitative content analysis of group verbal and non-verbal interaction. Results Findings revealed significant differences between the two modes of presence. Participants in the online mode engaged more in self-monitoring, self-planning, and group-monitoring behaviours. In contrast, participants in the physical mode focused more on task coordination, group-planning, and subject-matter discussions. Physical participants dominated discussions in terms of speaking time and turn-taking, while online participants contributed fewer, but task-oriented and deliberate, turns. For two students who switched between modes, participation, measured by speaking time, remained relatively stable, suggesting that, in these cases, participation may be shaped more by individual traits than by the mode of presence. Groups employing adaptive strategies, such as shared visual aids, successfully mitigated challenges in hybrid collaboration. Conclusions This study's findings offer exploratory insights relevant for both research and practice, providing guidance and tools for collaborative learning in hybrid settings, and ideas for thoughtful design of hybrid learning environments that enable productive collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102405
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do modes of presence matter? regulation and participation in graduate students’ hybrid synchronous group-based collaboration

Rachelle Esterhazy, Rogers Kaliisa, Kamila Misiejuk, Brendan Eagan et al.
Learning and Instruction
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Do modes of presence matter? regulation and participation in graduate students’ hybrid synchronous group-based collaboration

Rachelle Esterhazy, Rogers Kaliisa, Kamila Misiejuk, Brendan Eagan, Crina Damşa, Malcolm Langfold
article en

Abstract

STRUCTURED Abstract Background Synchronous hybrid education offers flexibility and accessibility, but can also pose challenges for students in regulating group work and ensuring equal participation in collaborative activities. Understanding how students address the challenges of regulation and participation in hybrid collaboration settings is critical for designing and supporting students for hybrid education. Aims This exploratory study examines how regulation strategies and verbal participation manifest across online and physical modes of presence in a collaborative project, and how students address challenges that emerge during hybrid synchronous group work. Sample Four graduate-level student groups (16 students) participating in a 14-week hybrid legal education course. Methods A multimodal exploratory mixed-methods approach combining Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), speaking time analysis, and qualitative content analysis of group verbal and non-verbal interaction. Results Findings revealed significant differences between the two modes of presence. Participants in the online mode engaged more in self-monitoring, self-planning, and group-monitoring behaviours. In contrast, participants in the physical mode focused more on task coordination, group-planning, and subject-matter discussions. Physical participants dominated discussions in terms of speaking time and turn-taking, while online participants contributed fewer, but task-oriented and deliberate, turns. For two students who switched between modes, participation, measured by speaking time, remained relatively stable, suggesting that, in these cases, participation may be shaped more by individual traits than by the mode of presence. Groups employing adaptive strategies, such as shared visual aids, successfully mitigated challenges in hybrid collaboration. Conclusions This study's findings offer exploratory insights relevant for both research and practice, providing guidance and tools for collaborative learning in hybrid settings, and ideas for thoughtful design of hybrid learning environments that enable productive collaboration.

Learning and InstructionVol. 105
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE), University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Oslo (NO), Metropolitan University (BD), Universidad Metropolitana (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.