The diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care: a prospective validation study

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care, using ophthalmologist-led screening as the reference standard. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes attending routine appointments at 10 primary care clinics underwent AI-assisted screening, followed by re-screening at an ophthalmology clinic. The quality of fundus images captured in primary care was independently assessed, and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by comparing AI-assisted results with ophthalmologist results, including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC. Two analyses were conducted: one including all images and one excluding those of poor quality. RESULTS: Among 183 patients (336 images), 18.6% of images were classified as poor quality. When all images were included, the AI-assisted screening achieved a sensitivity of 73.7%, specificity of 90.2%, PPV of 31.1%, NPV of 98.3%, and AUC of 0.82. Excluding poor-quality images improved sensitivity to 80.0%, NPV to 98.7%, and AUC to 0.84. Additional ocular findings unrelated to diabetic retinopathy were observed in 96 patients, including confirmed or non-specific signs of glaucoma, cataract, age-macular degeneration, benign nevus and reduced visual acuity. CONCLUSION: AI-assisted screening in primary care shows potential for clinical application, but further validation in larger populations and improvements in image quality are needed before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2026.2683982
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care: a prospective validation study

Jette Kolding Kristensen, Thomas Lohne Nørgaard, Martin Bach Jensen, Marie Germund Nielsen et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

The diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care: a prospective validation study

Jette Kolding Kristensen, Thomas Lohne Nørgaard, Martin Bach Jensen, Marie Germund Nielsen, M. Krogh, Morten Sig Ager Jensen, Henrik Vorum, Marie Ørskov
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care, using ophthalmologist-led screening as the reference standard. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes attending routine appointments at 10 primary care clinics underwent AI-assisted screening, followed by re-screening at an ophthalmology clinic. The quality of fundus images captured in primary care was independently assessed, and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by comparing AI-assisted results with ophthalmologist results, including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC. Two analyses were conducted: one including all images and one excluding those of poor quality. RESULTS: Among 183 patients (336 images), 18.6% of images were classified as poor quality. When all images were included, the AI-assisted screening achieved a sensitivity of 73.7%, specificity of 90.2%, PPV of 31.1%, NPV of 98.3%, and AUC of 0.82. Excluding poor-quality images improved sensitivity to 80.0%, NPV to 98.7%, and AUC to 0.84. Additional ocular findings unrelated to diabetic retinopathy were observed in 96 patients, including confirmed or non-specific signs of glaucoma, cataract, age-macular degeneration, benign nevus and reduced visual acuity. CONCLUSION: AI-assisted screening in primary care shows potential for clinical application, but further validation in larger populations and improvements in image quality are needed before clinical implementation.

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health CareVol. 44(1)
Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.