NeuroState as a Pre-LLM Execution Gate

Agentic LLM systems are vulnerable to cumulative prompt and context poisoning: an attacker can gradually drift the interaction into a risky state without triggering a single obvious injection signature. This paper tests whether a small stateful gate, NeuroState, can mitigate that risk when placed before dangerous execution decisions. We evaluate a CPOS-based ablation suite with fixed-rule Watchdog baseline conditions, CPOS-native NeuroState conditions, an external neurostate-engine projection, and action-sensitive WARN + EXEC gating. The main evidence comes from a deterministic harness with 100 repetitions per condition family over fixed attack and normal tapes. In that harness, the CPOS-native C4 policy achieves ASR 0.0000 and FPR 0.0000 while blocking the adaptive S4 attack through a WARN + EXEC rule. A separate benign executable workflow check over 1,000 repetitions also remains at FPR 0.0000. A smaller LLM-in-the-loop pilot provides supporting external validity, but the deterministic CPOS result is the main evidence path. We conclude that NeuroState is best framed as a pre-LLM execution gate rather than as another LLM judge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20669118
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

NeuroState as a Pre-LLM Execution Gate

Aya Mizutani
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Security and Verification in Computing
preprint

NeuroState as a Pre-LLM Execution Gate

Aya Mizutani
preprint en

Abstract

Agentic LLM systems are vulnerable to cumulative prompt and context poisoning: an attacker can gradually drift the interaction into a risky state without triggering a single obvious injection signature. This paper tests whether a small stateful gate, NeuroState, can mitigate that risk when placed before dangerous execution decisions. We evaluate a CPOS-based ablation suite with fixed-rule Watchdog baseline conditions, CPOS-native NeuroState conditions, an external neurostate-engine projection, and action-sensitive WARN + EXEC gating. The main evidence comes from a deterministic harness with 100 repetitions per condition family over fixed attack and normal tapes. In that harness, the CPOS-native C4 policy achieves ASR 0.0000 and FPR 0.0000 while blocking the adaptive S4 attack through a WARN + EXEC rule. A separate benign executable workflow check over 1,000 repetitions also remains at FPR 0.0000. A smaller LLM-in-the-loop pilot provides supporting external validity, but the deterministic CPOS result is the main evidence path. We conclude that NeuroState is best framed as a pre-LLM execution gate rather than as another LLM judge.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NeuroState as a Pre-LLM Execution Gate — Aya Mizutani · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS