Impact of scan duration and scatter correction on quantitative accuracy in Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging using LAFOV and SAFOV systems: a phantom and clinical evaluation

This study compared quantitative accuracy and image quality of post-radioembolization selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) 90 Y PET/CT using a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) and standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) system, focusing on absolute (ABS) versus relative (RS) scatter correction. Additionally, variance modeling and logistic regression were performed to define injected-activity thresholds ensuring reliable quantification at different acquisition durations. Phantom experiments were conducted on Biograph Vision Quadra (LAFOV) and Vision 600 (SAFOV) PET/CT scanners using NEMA IQ phantoms filled with 90 Y activity. Reconstructions employed OSEM + TOF + PSF with ABS and RS scatter correction at 50 min (both scanners) and 10- and 1-minute (only for LAFOV). Metrics included NEMA recovery coefficients (RC) and background variability (BV). 44 post-SIRT patients (median age 70 y) were analyzed for image-based quantification of injected activity using whole-liver VOIs, across multiple durations (20, 15, 10, 5, 1 min). Metrics included Bland–Altman analysis, equivalence testing (± 10%), and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Variance–activity relationships and logistic regression quantified thresholds for 80%, 90% and 95% success probability. LAFOV achieved higher RCs and ~ 3× lower BV than SAFOV. ABS yielded significantly improved accuracy and stability versus RS, particularly at short scans. Patient data acquired on the LAFOV system showed ABS quantification equivalent to injected activity within ± 10% for ≥ 5 min (CCC ≥ 0.99), whereas RS required ≥ 10 min. Variance followed a power-law decay (γ ≈ 1.5 at 5 min), and logistic regression identified an activity threshold of ~ 1.6 GBq for 90% accuracy at 5 min. At ≥ 10 min, quantification became independent of activity. Compared with a SAFOV 50-minute clinical routine acquisition, LAFOV PET enabled a similar BV performance at 7-times accelerated scanning duration. LAFOV PET/CT with absolute scatter correction enables accurate 90 Y quantification and dosimetry with acquisition times as short as 10 min regardless of the administered 90 Y activity, supporting efficient clinical post-SIRT imaging workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EJNMMI Physics
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00907-y
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of scan duration and scatter correction on quantitative accuracy in Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging using LAFOV and SAFOV systems: a phantom and clinical evaluation

Hasan Sari, Kalyani Pandya, Marc Schindewolf, Christos Sachpekidis et al.
EJNMMI Physics
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Impact of scan duration and scatter correction on quantitative accuracy in Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging using LAFOV and SAFOV systems: a phantom and clinical evaluation

Hasan Sari, Kalyani Pandya, Marc Schindewolf, Christos Sachpekidis, Ali Afshar‐Oromieh, Axel Rominger, Robert Seifert, Konstantinos Zeimpekis, Kuangyu Shi, Magdalena Kulgawczuk, Carola Bregenzer
article en

Abstract

This study compared quantitative accuracy and image quality of post-radioembolization selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) 90 Y PET/CT using a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) and standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) system, focusing on absolute (ABS) versus relative (RS) scatter correction. Additionally, variance modeling and logistic regression were performed to define injected-activity thresholds ensuring reliable quantification at different acquisition durations. Phantom experiments were conducted on Biograph Vision Quadra (LAFOV) and Vision 600 (SAFOV) PET/CT scanners using NEMA IQ phantoms filled with 90 Y activity. Reconstructions employed OSEM + TOF + PSF with ABS and RS scatter correction at 50 min (both scanners) and 10- and 1-minute (only for LAFOV). Metrics included NEMA recovery coefficients (RC) and background variability (BV). 44 post-SIRT patients (median age 70 y) were analyzed for image-based quantification of injected activity using whole-liver VOIs, across multiple durations (20, 15, 10, 5, 1 min). Metrics included Bland–Altman analysis, equivalence testing (± 10%), and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Variance–activity relationships and logistic regression quantified thresholds for 80%, 90% and 95% success probability. LAFOV achieved higher RCs and ~ 3× lower BV than SAFOV. ABS yielded significantly improved accuracy and stability versus RS, particularly at short scans. Patient data acquired on the LAFOV system showed ABS quantification equivalent to injected activity within ± 10% for ≥ 5 min (CCC ≥ 0.99), whereas RS required ≥ 10 min. Variance followed a power-law decay (γ ≈ 1.5 at 5 min), and logistic regression identified an activity threshold of ~ 1.6 GBq for 90% accuracy at 5 min. At ≥ 10 min, quantification became independent of activity. Compared with a SAFOV 50-minute clinical routine acquisition, LAFOV PET enabled a similar BV performance at 7-times accelerated scanning duration. LAFOV PET/CT with absolute scatter correction enables accurate 90 Y quantification and dosimetry with acquisition times as short as 10 min regardless of the administered 90 Y activity, supporting efficient clinical post-SIRT imaging workflows.

EJNMMI Physics
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Siemens (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.