Autologous tumor-based vaccines in canine oncology: a systematic review of safety, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential

BACKGROUND: Autologous tumor vaccines have been investigated as immunotherapeutic strategies in veterinary oncology and may represent relevant translational models for comparative cancer immunotherapy. However, reported clinical outcomes in dogs remain heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, clinical outcomes, and immunological assessment methods of autologous tumor vaccines in dogs. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus identified 24 eligible studies evaluating autologous tumor vaccines in dogs. Vaccine platforms, safety data, clinical outcomes, and immunological assessments were analyzed descriptively. Exploratory pooled hazard ratio analyses were performed using random-effects models when applicable. RESULTS: Autologous tumor vaccines were generally reported as well tolerated, with predominantly mild and transient adverse events. Clinical outcomes varied substantially across tumor types and study designs. Canine lymphoma represented the setting with the greatest concentration of evidence, including the few randomized and controlled studies identified. Several lymphoma studies reported longer time to progression and lymphoma-specific survival in vaccinated dogs compared with chemotherapy-alone or historical comparator groups, although findings were not consistent across all studies. Exploratory pooled analyses suggested a trend toward reduced risk of progression and lymphoma-related mortality in immunotherapy-treated dogs; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of studies and methodological heterogeneity. In solid tumors, outcomes were more variable and evidence remained predominantly exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that autologous tumor vaccines in dogs are generally feasible and well tolerated, although methodological limitations restrict interpretation of therapeutic efficacy. Further prospective and standardized studies are needed to clarify their role in veterinary oncology and comparative cancer immunotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128836
Primary Topic
Veterinary Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autologous tumor-based vaccines in canine oncology: a systematic review of safety, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential

Cristina de Oliveira Massoco, Igor Simões Tiagua Vicente, Bruno Roberto Vidal Tuani, Juliana Rodrigues Leitão et al.
Vaccine
Veterinary Oncology Research
article

Autologous tumor-based vaccines in canine oncology: a systematic review of safety, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential

Cristina de Oliveira Massoco, Igor Simões Tiagua Vicente, Bruno Roberto Vidal Tuani, Juliana Rodrigues Leitão, Júlia Maria Matera, Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous tumor vaccines have been investigated as immunotherapeutic strategies in veterinary oncology and may represent relevant translational models for comparative cancer immunotherapy. However, reported clinical outcomes in dogs remain heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, clinical outcomes, and immunological assessment methods of autologous tumor vaccines in dogs. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus identified 24 eligible studies evaluating autologous tumor vaccines in dogs. Vaccine platforms, safety data, clinical outcomes, and immunological assessments were analyzed descriptively. Exploratory pooled hazard ratio analyses were performed using random-effects models when applicable. RESULTS: Autologous tumor vaccines were generally reported as well tolerated, with predominantly mild and transient adverse events. Clinical outcomes varied substantially across tumor types and study designs. Canine lymphoma represented the setting with the greatest concentration of evidence, including the few randomized and controlled studies identified. Several lymphoma studies reported longer time to progression and lymphoma-specific survival in vaccinated dogs compared with chemotherapy-alone or historical comparator groups, although findings were not consistent across all studies. Exploratory pooled analyses suggested a trend toward reduced risk of progression and lymphoma-related mortality in immunotherapy-treated dogs; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of studies and methodological heterogeneity. In solid tumors, outcomes were more variable and evidence remained predominantly exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that autologous tumor vaccines in dogs are generally feasible and well tolerated, although methodological limitations restrict interpretation of therapeutic efficacy. Further prospective and standardized studies are needed to clarify their role in veterinary oncology and comparative cancer immunotherapy.

VaccineVol. 88
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Veterinary Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.