The effectiveness and tolerability of trauma-focused interventions for trauma symptoms in individuals who have psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: People with psychosis and a trauma history have worse clinical and functional outcomes compared to those without a trauma history. Services often don't provide trauma-focused interventions for psychosis. This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare multiple outcomes of safety, feasibility, acceptability, clinical and cost effectiveness of different trauma-focused therapies (TFTs) for people with psychosis. STUDY DESIGN: For this meta-analysis and systematic review, Embase, PsycINFO and Medline were searched until 5th January 2026 for original RCTs of TFTs for individuals with psychosis, with the design consistent with PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were the safety, feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of these treatments. Meta analyses were conducted when at least three studies reported quantitative measures of clinical outcomes. Cochrane Revised Risk of Bias tool for RCTs was used for quality assessment. STUDY RESULTS: Ten RCTs were included. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive therapies (CR) were safe, acceptable and cost effective. EMDR vs treatment-as-usual (TAU) significantly reduced positive psychotic symptoms post-treatment, but not at 6-month follow-up (studies = 4, outcomes = 9, g = 0.21, p = 0.05). EMDR significantly reduced PTSD symptoms post-treatment (studies = 3, outcomes = 6, g = 0.84, p < 0.001) and at 6-month follow-up (studies = 4, outcomes = 8, g = 0.63, se = 0.10, p < 0.001) vs TAU. PE showed reductions in PTSD symptoms and paranoia, and CR's showed reductions in PTSD symptoms post-treatment (vs TAU). CONCLUSIONS: EMDR has the most published studies suggesting its potential to be an effective treatment for this population. Further RCTs are required to assess symptom outcomes and healthcare costs of all interventions examined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schizophrenia Research
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2026.06.008
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effectiveness and tolerability of trauma-focused interventions for trauma symptoms in individuals who have psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Felix Opper, Hasina Khan, Ava Mason, Yanakan Logeswaran et al.
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

The effectiveness and tolerability of trauma-focused interventions for trauma symptoms in individuals who have psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Felix Opper, Hasina Khan, Ava Mason, Yanakan Logeswaran, Louise Johns
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: People with psychosis and a trauma history have worse clinical and functional outcomes compared to those without a trauma history. Services often don't provide trauma-focused interventions for psychosis. This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare multiple outcomes of safety, feasibility, acceptability, clinical and cost effectiveness of different trauma-focused therapies (TFTs) for people with psychosis. STUDY DESIGN: For this meta-analysis and systematic review, Embase, PsycINFO and Medline were searched until 5th January 2026 for original RCTs of TFTs for individuals with psychosis, with the design consistent with PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were the safety, feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of these treatments. Meta analyses were conducted when at least three studies reported quantitative measures of clinical outcomes. Cochrane Revised Risk of Bias tool for RCTs was used for quality assessment. STUDY RESULTS: Ten RCTs were included. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive therapies (CR) were safe, acceptable and cost effective. EMDR vs treatment-as-usual (TAU) significantly reduced positive psychotic symptoms post-treatment, but not at 6-month follow-up (studies = 4, outcomes = 9, g = 0.21, p = 0.05). EMDR significantly reduced PTSD symptoms post-treatment (studies = 3, outcomes = 6, g = 0.84, p < 0.001) and at 6-month follow-up (studies = 4, outcomes = 8, g = 0.63, se = 0.10, p < 0.001) vs TAU. PE showed reductions in PTSD symptoms and paranoia, and CR's showed reductions in PTSD symptoms post-treatment (vs TAU). CONCLUSIONS: EMDR has the most published studies suggesting its potential to be an effective treatment for this population. Further RCTs are required to assess symptom outcomes and healthcare costs of all interventions examined.

Schizophrenia ResearchVol. 295
King's College London (GB), Warneford Hospital (GB), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.