THE FUNDAMENTAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS MODEL AND THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Gavin Huang's article in confrontation with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Gavin Huang’s The Fundamental Interrelationships Model – An Ontological Alternative to the Theory of Everything, Part 1 (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Huang’s Fundamental Interrelationships Model (IRM) as a universal ontological-geometrical framework based on invariant operators such as seriality, parallelism, transition of state, critical points, continuity–discontinuity, convergence–divergence, contraction–expansion, singularity–plurality, symmetry–asymmetry, order–disorder, hierarchy, and interconnectedness. The analysis argues that Huang’s IRM establishes a significant field of dialogue with TO because both frameworks reject a merely physics-bound account of totality and seek a deeper structure capable of articulating physical, biological, cognitive, social, and cosmological domains. However, the article also identifies important tensions: while the IRM is primarily grounded in cross-domain relational generalization, TO requires modal necessity derived from its axioms, including the spherical logical Nothing, uniqueness, infinity as a non-element, boundary, triadic observation, recursive composition, and the transcendent element. Special attention is given to the current interpretation of TO according to which the transcendent element corresponds to knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. The article proposes that the IRM may be interpreted as a relational-phenomenological grammar of transformations, while TO offers a deeper modal-cosmogonic grounding for objectivity. The study concludes that Huang’s article presents a high degree of dialogue with TO, especially regarding boundary, transition, convergence, divergence, hierarchy, informational emergence, and the critique of reductionist approaches to a Theory of Everything. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Gavin Huang; Fundamental Interrelationships Model; IRM; modal ontology; Theory of Everything; ontological geometry; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; atomic information; atomic radiations; cosmogony; cosmological Eras; boundary; convergence; divergence; recursive composition; philosophical cosmology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20651640
Primary Topic
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE FUNDAMENTAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS MODEL AND THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Gavin Huang's article in confrontation with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
article

THE FUNDAMENTAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS MODEL AND THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Gavin Huang's article in confrontation with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Gavin Huang’s The Fundamental Interrelationships Model – An Ontological Alternative to the Theory of Everything, Part 1 (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Huang’s Fundamental Interrelationships Model (IRM) as a universal ontological-geometrical framework based on invariant operators such as seriality, parallelism, transition of state, critical points, continuity–discontinuity, convergence–divergence, contraction–expansion, singularity–plurality, symmetry–asymmetry, order–disorder, hierarchy, and interconnectedness. The analysis argues that Huang’s IRM establishes a significant field of dialogue with TO because both frameworks reject a merely physics-bound account of totality and seek a deeper structure capable of articulating physical, biological, cognitive, social, and cosmological domains. However, the article also identifies important tensions: while the IRM is primarily grounded in cross-domain relational generalization, TO requires modal necessity derived from its axioms, including the spherical logical Nothing, uniqueness, infinity as a non-element, boundary, triadic observation, recursive composition, and the transcendent element. Special attention is given to the current interpretation of TO according to which the transcendent element corresponds to knowledge or information produced in atomic relations, equivalent to atomic radiations. The article proposes that the IRM may be interpreted as a relational-phenomenological grammar of transformations, while TO offers a deeper modal-cosmogonic grounding for objectivity. The study concludes that Huang’s article presents a high degree of dialogue with TO, especially regarding boundary, transition, convergence, divergence, hierarchy, informational emergence, and the critique of reductionist approaches to a Theory of Everything. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Gavin Huang; Fundamental Interrelationships Model; IRM; modal ontology; Theory of Everything; ontological geometry; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; atomic information; atomic radiations; cosmogony; cosmological Eras; boundary; convergence; divergence; recursive composition; philosophical cosmology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.