Proxy patients’ perceptions of genetic counselor empathy responses

Empathy, the ability to understand and communicate another's experience to them, positively affects genetic counseling processes and outcomes. Genetic counseling, a specialty healthcare profession, provides education and support for those impacted by genetic disease; thus, empathy is critical. Limited studies have explored patients' perceptions of genetic counselor (GC) empathy responses. This study investigated the types of GC responses proxy patients perceived as most empathic and why. Female MTurk workers (n = 198) completed a survey containing two hypothetical genetic counseling scenarios (Fabry disease; postnatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate) that ended with a patient statement followed by five different GC responses. Participants were asked to identify the GC response that best conveyed empathy and explain their choice. Every GC response was selected by at least one participant. Inductive content analysis of participants' rationales yielded six categories: Understanding, Problem Solving, Sympathizing, Focusing on the Patient, Validating, and Miscellaneous. Understanding was the most prevalent rationale for both scenarios (~ 50% each). While GC responses containing the words "I'm sorry…" were chosen most often for both scenarios (~ 45% each), Sympathizing was the rationale for only ~ 20% of these GC responses. Logistic regression analyses showed significant predictors varied across scenarios and between rationales, with few significant demographic predictors. Participants differed in preferences for empathy statements and rationales, signaling context and tailoring are important when considering empathy. Patient demographics are not recommended in predicting the type of GC patients may find empathic. Ongoing assessment of patients' feelings and needs (empathic resonance) will allow genetic counselors to tailor their empathy communication (expressed empathy) accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Genetics
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00909-4
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proxy patients’ perceptions of genetic counselor empathy responses

Patricia McCarthy Veach, Krista Redlinger‐Grosse, Ian M. MacFarlane, Janice Baker et al.
Journal of Community Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Proxy patients’ perceptions of genetic counselor empathy responses

Patricia McCarthy Veach, Krista Redlinger‐Grosse, Ian M. MacFarlane, Janice Baker, Bouchard
article en

Abstract

Empathy, the ability to understand and communicate another's experience to them, positively affects genetic counseling processes and outcomes. Genetic counseling, a specialty healthcare profession, provides education and support for those impacted by genetic disease; thus, empathy is critical. Limited studies have explored patients' perceptions of genetic counselor (GC) empathy responses. This study investigated the types of GC responses proxy patients perceived as most empathic and why. Female MTurk workers (n = 198) completed a survey containing two hypothetical genetic counseling scenarios (Fabry disease; postnatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate) that ended with a patient statement followed by five different GC responses. Participants were asked to identify the GC response that best conveyed empathy and explain their choice. Every GC response was selected by at least one participant. Inductive content analysis of participants' rationales yielded six categories: Understanding, Problem Solving, Sympathizing, Focusing on the Patient, Validating, and Miscellaneous. Understanding was the most prevalent rationale for both scenarios (~ 50% each). While GC responses containing the words "I'm sorry…" were chosen most often for both scenarios (~ 45% each), Sympathizing was the rationale for only ~ 20% of these GC responses. Logistic regression analyses showed significant predictors varied across scenarios and between rationales, with few significant demographic predictors. Participants differed in preferences for empathy statements and rationales, signaling context and tailoring are important when considering empathy. Patient demographics are not recommended in predicting the type of GC patients may find empathic. Ongoing assessment of patients' feelings and needs (empathic resonance) will allow genetic counselors to tailor their empathy communication (expressed empathy) accordingly.

Journal of Community GeneticsVol. 17(3)
University of Minnesota (US), Institute of Human Genetics (PL), Children's Minnesota (US), University of Manitoba (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.