The effects of using a Virtual Agent to Signal Danger on Hazard Prediction ability in Conditionally-Automated Driving

Conditionally-automated vehicles require drivers to remain hazard-aware while disengaged from driving and engaged in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), yet conventional visual warning interfaces do not fully address this attentional conflict. While psychological research demonstrates social cues are processed more efficiently than visual information, this has not been evaluated for safety-critical warnings in conditionally-automated driving. This paper presents the first empirical investigation into using a virtual agent to indicate danger and aid situational awareness while driver perform a NDRT. Across two experiments, hazard prediction ability was assessed with either a visual cue or virtual agent cueing danger. When including an attention-capturing element, both visual and social cue types mitigated driver distraction, maintaining hazard prediction comparable with undistracted driving. These findings demonstrate that virtual agents can be as effective as conventional visual cues in aiding situational awareness in safety-critical conditionally-automated driving contexts, offering design insights for in-vehicle attentional displays supporting driver awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3820654
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of using a Virtual Agent to Signal Danger on Hazard Prediction ability in Conditionally-Automated Driving

Stephen Brewster, Thomas Goodge, Frank Pollick
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The effects of using a Virtual Agent to Signal Danger on Hazard Prediction ability in Conditionally-Automated Driving

Stephen Brewster, Thomas Goodge, Frank Pollick
article en

Abstract

Conditionally-automated vehicles require drivers to remain hazard-aware while disengaged from driving and engaged in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), yet conventional visual warning interfaces do not fully address this attentional conflict. While psychological research demonstrates social cues are processed more efficiently than visual information, this has not been evaluated for safety-critical warnings in conditionally-automated driving. This paper presents the first empirical investigation into using a virtual agent to indicate danger and aid situational awareness while driver perform a NDRT. Across two experiments, hazard prediction ability was assessed with either a visual cue or virtual agent cueing danger. When including an attention-capturing element, both visual and social cue types mitigated driver distraction, maintaining hazard prediction comparable with undistracted driving. These findings demonstrate that virtual agents can be as effective as conventional visual cues in aiding situational awareness in safety-critical conditionally-automated driving contexts, offering design insights for in-vehicle attentional displays supporting driver awareness.

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The effects of using a Virtual Agent to Signal Danger on Hazard Prediction ability in Conditionally-Automated Driving — Stephen Brewster, Thomas Goodge, et al. · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS