The Bisphosphonate Accumulation Index (BAI): A Quantitative Metric for Cumulative Antiresorptive Exposure in Pre-Procedural Dental and Surgical Assessment

Background/Objectives: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication of bisphosphonate therapy, whose risk is currently assessed through qualitative staging systems that do not integrate pharmacological determinants of cumulative drug exposure. The aim of this study is to present the Bisphosphonate Accumulation Index (BAI), a pharmacologically derived, dimensionless scalar quantifying cumulative exposure to bone-targeted antiresorptive agents by integrating relative potency, administered dose, dosing frequency, route-specific bioavailability, and treatment duration, for use as a pre-procedural assessment tool in patients receiving bisphosphonates. Methods: The BAI combines five pharmacologically grounded parameters from peer-reviewed literature: (1) relative antiresorptive potency referenced to etidronate; (2) dose per administration (mg); (3) monthly dosing frequency; (4) bioavailability route; and (5) years of treatment within the preceding 10-year window. The model includes nine bisphosphonates registered in Italy. Results: The BAI spans approximately five orders of magnitude (from <1000 for short-term oral therapy to >120,000 for monthly intravenous zoledronic acid). Four analyses support the model: sensitivity analysis identifies relative potency as the main source of variance; ecological calibration against nine MRONJ incidence data points yielded r = 0.911 (p = 0.0006, R2 = 0.829), indicating that the BAI accounts for approximately 83% of the population-level variance in published incidence rates across heterogeneous regimens (ecological correlation; this does not establish individual-level predictive validity); Monte Carlo simulation on 10,000 patients generated a plausible exposure-strata distribution (6.1% low, 66.6% moderate, 27.3% high); and concordance analysis with a DDD-based metric showed discordance in 7/8 regimens. Conclusions: The BAI is a transparent, reproducible, pharmacologically grounded metric of cumulative antiresorptive exposure addressing the quantitative gap identified in the AAOMS 2022 Position Paper. The BAI measures pharmacological exposure, which is a necessary but insufficient component of MRONJ risk; clinical modifiers such as corticosteroid co-administration, diabetes, renal function, and procedure type are not integrated and must be evaluated independently. The provisional exposure strata reported here (<1000, 1000–10,000, >10,000) are hypothesis-generating and intended solely to guide the design of validation studies; they should not be used as clinical decision rules until prospective patient-level validation has been completed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14060364
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bisphosphonate Accumulation Index (BAI): A Quantitative Metric for Cumulative Antiresorptive Exposure in Pre-Procedural Dental and Surgical Assessment

Marina Borgese, Nicolò Vercellini, Piero Antonio Zecca, Marco Serafin et al.
Dentistry Journal
Bone health and treatments
article

The Bisphosphonate Accumulation Index (BAI): A Quantitative Metric for Cumulative Antiresorptive Exposure in Pre-Procedural Dental and Surgical Assessment

Marina Borgese, Nicolò Vercellini, Piero Antonio Zecca, Marco Serafin, Fabio Brusamolino, Rachele Elisa Miotto
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication of bisphosphonate therapy, whose risk is currently assessed through qualitative staging systems that do not integrate pharmacological determinants of cumulative drug exposure. The aim of this study is to present the Bisphosphonate Accumulation Index (BAI), a pharmacologically derived, dimensionless scalar quantifying cumulative exposure to bone-targeted antiresorptive agents by integrating relative potency, administered dose, dosing frequency, route-specific bioavailability, and treatment duration, for use as a pre-procedural assessment tool in patients receiving bisphosphonates. Methods: The BAI combines five pharmacologically grounded parameters from peer-reviewed literature: (1) relative antiresorptive potency referenced to etidronate; (2) dose per administration (mg); (3) monthly dosing frequency; (4) bioavailability route; and (5) years of treatment within the preceding 10-year window. The model includes nine bisphosphonates registered in Italy. Results: The BAI spans approximately five orders of magnitude (from <1000 for short-term oral therapy to >120,000 for monthly intravenous zoledronic acid). Four analyses support the model: sensitivity analysis identifies relative potency as the main source of variance; ecological calibration against nine MRONJ incidence data points yielded r = 0.911 (p = 0.0006, R2 = 0.829), indicating that the BAI accounts for approximately 83% of the population-level variance in published incidence rates across heterogeneous regimens (ecological correlation; this does not establish individual-level predictive validity); Monte Carlo simulation on 10,000 patients generated a plausible exposure-strata distribution (6.1% low, 66.6% moderate, 27.3% high); and concordance analysis with a DDD-based metric showed discordance in 7/8 regimens. Conclusions: The BAI is a transparent, reproducible, pharmacologically grounded metric of cumulative antiresorptive exposure addressing the quantitative gap identified in the AAOMS 2022 Position Paper. The BAI measures pharmacological exposure, which is a necessary but insufficient component of MRONJ risk; clinical modifiers such as corticosteroid co-administration, diabetes, renal function, and procedure type are not integrated and must be evaluated independently. The provisional exposure strata reported here (<1000, 1000–10,000, >10,000) are hypothesis-generating and intended solely to guide the design of validation studies; they should not be used as clinical decision rules until prospective patient-level validation has been completed.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(6)
University of Insubria (IT), University of Milan (IT), Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi (IT), Fondazione Audiologica Varese (IT), Academy of Osseointegration (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.