Covert perception of AI adversely impacts team performance and changes physiological dynamics despite human-level AI competence

Abstract Collaborating with an expert teammate is generally expected to enhance team performance. However, when the expert is presented as an artificial intelligence (AI) agent, our study reveals a counterintuitive outcome: teams performed worse when a teammate was perceived as AI, especially when task difficulty increased. Using a virtual reality-based sensorimotor task, we observed that the inclusion of a human teammate introduced as an artificial agent disrupted team dynamics, leading to elevated arousal, reduced engagement, and diminished communication intensity among human participants. These effects persisted even as the human teammates’ trust in the AI teammate increased over time. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about the benefits of AI in team settings and highlight the critical need for human-centered AI design to mitigate adverse physiological and behavioral impacts, ensuring more effective human-AI collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-06-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44387-026-00130-1
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Covert perception of AI adversely impacts team performance and changes physiological dynamics despite human-level AI competence

Yinuo Qin, Paul Sajda, Richard T. Lee
npj Artificial Intelligence
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Covert perception of AI adversely impacts team performance and changes physiological dynamics despite human-level AI competence

Yinuo Qin, Paul Sajda, Richard T. Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Collaborating with an expert teammate is generally expected to enhance team performance. However, when the expert is presented as an artificial intelligence (AI) agent, our study reveals a counterintuitive outcome: teams performed worse when a teammate was perceived as AI, especially when task difficulty increased. Using a virtual reality-based sensorimotor task, we observed that the inclusion of a human teammate introduced as an artificial agent disrupted team dynamics, leading to elevated arousal, reduced engagement, and diminished communication intensity among human participants. These effects persisted even as the human teammates’ trust in the AI teammate increased over time. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about the benefits of AI in team settings and highlight the critical need for human-centered AI design to mitigate adverse physiological and behavioral impacts, ensuring more effective human-AI collaboration.

npj Artificial Intelligence
Columbia University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, Strong, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Army Research Laboratory
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.