Toward the assessment of belief in stages of grief: Construction and validation of a scale

Despite concerns that stage models of grief may harm bereaved people, the impact of belief in stages remains understudied. This is partly due to lack of a comprehensive measurement-instrument to assess belief in stages. Thus, the current study sought to develop such an instrument. Sixty-four items were generated by experts and subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. This culminated in the 19-item Belief in Stages of Grief Scale (BSG), consisting of five factors (Positive, Anxious, Rigid, Passive, and Prescriptive Endorsement). Convergent validity analyses indicated that belief in stages may not be associated with adverse outcomes. However, limitations of this research, including the use of a predominantly female and well-educated convenience sample, highlight the necessity of further investigation. The current research paves the way for future research into the impact of stage-thinking through the development of the BSG and examination of the relationship between belief in stages and health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Death Studies
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2026.2682815
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward the assessment of belief in stages of grief: Construction and validation of a scale

Margaret Stroebe, Marjolein Missler, Paul A. Boelen, Henk Schut et al.
Death Studies
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

Toward the assessment of belief in stages of grief: Construction and validation of a scale

Margaret Stroebe, Marjolein Missler, Paul A. Boelen, Henk Schut, Kate A. Avis
article en

Abstract

Despite concerns that stage models of grief may harm bereaved people, the impact of belief in stages remains understudied. This is partly due to lack of a comprehensive measurement-instrument to assess belief in stages. Thus, the current study sought to develop such an instrument. Sixty-four items were generated by experts and subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. This culminated in the 19-item Belief in Stages of Grief Scale (BSG), consisting of five factors (Positive, Anxious, Rigid, Passive, and Prescriptive Endorsement). Convergent validity analyses indicated that belief in stages may not be associated with adverse outcomes. However, limitations of this research, including the use of a predominantly female and well-educated convenience sample, highlight the necessity of further investigation. The current research paves the way for future research into the impact of stage-thinking through the development of the BSG and examination of the relationship between belief in stages and health outcomes.

Death Studies
University of Groningen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.