Liberation is (Im)Possible: 'Everything for Everyone' as a Praxis of Liberatory Impossibility

<span style="font-weight: 400;">This thesis considers the story and storytelling of the 2022 visionary fiction novel </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Everything for Everyone: An Oral History of the New York Commune, 2052-2072</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> by M.E. O&rsquo;Brien and Eman Abdelhadi to explore the relationship between liberation and impossibility. The Introduction of this project posits a theoretical foundation for conceptualizing liberation in relation to impossibility and a grammar of queer abolition, arguing that both are important to the praxis of liberation. Chapters One and Two revolve specifically around analyzing the novel, and they respectively consider the novel&rsquo;s content and genre as praxes of liberation. This thesis asks: What is the function of impossibility when considering liberation? And what does it mean to tell an impossible story? Further, this thesis posits </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Everything for Everyone</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> not only as imagining a liberatory world, but as using &ldquo;critical future fabulation&rdquo; to tell an impossible story &ndash; or, a story of liberation in a liberatory way. Ultimately, this piece highlights the necessity of impossible storytelling and seeks to inspire us to take seriously how we can make sense of our embodiment and reimagine knowledge in pursuit of liberation. This thesis dreams that we might each lean into the audacity of imagining boldly and broadly so that when we ask ourselves if we feel &ldquo;free enough,&rdquo; we might hold hand in hand the importance of addressing the barriers to freedom presented by our immediate material reality, and the grammatical constraints that attempt to foreclose our ability to imagine an expansive freedom.</span>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/4pjd-mx77
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liberation is (Im)Possible: 'Everything for Everyone' as a Praxis of Liberatory Impossibility

Emma Culley
UNC Libraries
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Liberation is (Im)Possible: 'Everything for Everyone' as a Praxis of Liberatory Impossibility

Emma Culley
article en

Abstract

<span style="font-weight: 400;">This thesis considers the story and storytelling of the 2022 visionary fiction novel </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Everything for Everyone: An Oral History of the New York Commune, 2052-2072</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> by M.E. O&rsquo;Brien and Eman Abdelhadi to explore the relationship between liberation and impossibility. The Introduction of this project posits a theoretical foundation for conceptualizing liberation in relation to impossibility and a grammar of queer abolition, arguing that both are important to the praxis of liberation. Chapters One and Two revolve specifically around analyzing the novel, and they respectively consider the novel&rsquo;s content and genre as praxes of liberation. This thesis asks: What is the function of impossibility when considering liberation? And what does it mean to tell an impossible story? Further, this thesis posits </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Everything for Everyone</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> not only as imagining a liberatory world, but as using &ldquo;critical future fabulation&rdquo; to tell an impossible story &ndash; or, a story of liberation in a liberatory way. Ultimately, this piece highlights the necessity of impossible storytelling and seeks to inspire us to take seriously how we can make sense of our embodiment and reimagine knowledge in pursuit of liberation. This thesis dreams that we might each lean into the audacity of imagining boldly and broadly so that when we ask ourselves if we feel &ldquo;free enough,&rdquo; we might hold hand in hand the importance of addressing the barriers to freedom presented by our immediate material reality, and the grammatical constraints that attempt to foreclose our ability to imagine an expansive freedom.</span>

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Liberation is (Im)Possible: 'Everything for Everyone' as a Praxis of Liberatory Impossibility — Emma Culley · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS