The Creativity Paradox of Generative <scp>AI</scp> in Design Education: How <scp>AI</scp> Literacy and Motivation Reshape Creative Learning

ABSTRACT Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is quickly changing the foundations of design education. It alters how creativity is understood, created and judged in higher education. This issue is especially important in design fields, where creativity involves not just productivity and fast idea generation but also the ability to handle uncertainty, engage in reflective experimentation, and think independently. In this context, the current study examined the relationships among teachers' acceptance of AI, their AI literacy, students' motivation to learn, and creativity in AI‐supported design education at Chinese universities. The research gathered data from randomly sampled teachers and students at 10 universities known for their art and design programmes, which include visual communication, industrial design, digital media, animation and environmental design. This study contributes to the growing research on AI in design education by shifting the focus from celebrating technological advances to a more critical perspective on how humans interact with AI in creative contexts. The findings suggest that AI can both enhance and restrict creativity, depending on how it affects students' independence, cognitive engagement, and motivation. Thus, the future of design education involving AI should not only focus on technological complexity or adoption rates, but also on its ability to maintain human originality, reflective thought, and the uncertainty that is vital to creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70727
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Creativity Paradox of Generative AI in Design Education: How AI Literacy and Motivation Reshape Creative Learning

Endale Tadesse, Ping Hu, Xianwen Liang, Jiang Diankun
European Journal of Education
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

The Creativity Paradox of Generative AI in Design Education: How AI Literacy and Motivation Reshape Creative Learning

Endale Tadesse, Ping Hu, Xianwen Liang, Jiang Diankun
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is quickly changing the foundations of design education. It alters how creativity is understood, created and judged in higher education. This issue is especially important in design fields, where creativity involves not just productivity and fast idea generation but also the ability to handle uncertainty, engage in reflective experimentation, and think independently. In this context, the current study examined the relationships among teachers' acceptance of AI, their AI literacy, students' motivation to learn, and creativity in AI‐supported design education at Chinese universities. The research gathered data from randomly sampled teachers and students at 10 universities known for their art and design programmes, which include visual communication, industrial design, digital media, animation and environmental design. This study contributes to the growing research on AI in design education by shifting the focus from celebrating technological advances to a more critical perspective on how humans interact with AI in creative contexts. The findings suggest that AI can both enhance and restrict creativity, depending on how it affects students' independence, cognitive engagement, and motivation. Thus, the future of design education involving AI should not only focus on technological complexity or adoption rates, but also on its ability to maintain human originality, reflective thought, and the uncertainty that is vital to creativity.

European Journal of EducationVol. 61(3)
Zhejiang Normal University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Creativity Paradox of Generative <scp>AI</scp> in Design Education: How <scp>AI</scp> Literacy and Motivation Reshape Creative Learning — Endale Tadesse, Ping Hu, et al. · European Journal of Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS