Optimization of laser powder bed fusion process parameters for AlSi10Mg samples towards mechanical strength by using metaheuristic optimization algorithms

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is a highly favoured route for additive manufacturing of AlSi10Mg alloys; however, the maximum mechanical performance of additively manufactured components relies on tight control of a web of interrelated process variables. This research develops a statistical-metaheuristic hybrid model which optimizes the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of LPBF-fabricated AlSi10Mg within a localized region of the process parameter space. This scientific research was conducted with a limited 3 2 full-factorial experimental design ( n = 9, without replication) that constructed a two-variable quadratic regression model (R 2 = 0.7475, RMSE = 34.57 MPa) between Laser Power ( P ) and Exposure Time ( E ) and tensile response. The Volumetric Energy Density (VED) derived was controlled for out of the model in order to remove the statistical multicollinearity that it brings. Four metaheuristic algorithms (Genetic Algorithm (GA), Simulated Annealing (SA), Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), and JAYA) were then run under a deliberately limited stress test of computational load ( N = 12, Iter max = 100) in MATLAB R2025b. The parameter-dependent solvers, GA and SA, collapsed to an early convergence and all stopped at local optima of 364.30 MPa and 355.59 MPa, respectively. In comparison, JAYA and TLBO, which were parameter-free, found the estimated optimum of 378.74 MPa at P = 350 W and E = 50 µs for the fitted response surface. Two physical experiments that were printed at these settings yielded a real UTS of 380.45 MPa and a prediction error of 0.45%, far less than the 5% engineering threshold. This consensus confirms the regression model and the comparative efficiency of parameter-free algorithms as a valuable proof-of-concept optimization approach within constrained LPBF parameter boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Materials
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-026-00758-5
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of laser powder bed fusion process parameters for AlSi10Mg samples towards mechanical strength by using metaheuristic optimization algorithms

Vinaykumar S. Jatti, Vijaykumar S. Jatti, G Bharathiraja, A. Johnson Santhosh et al.
Discover Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Optimization of laser powder bed fusion process parameters for AlSi10Mg samples towards mechanical strength by using metaheuristic optimization algorithms

Vinaykumar S. Jatti, Vijaykumar S. Jatti, G Bharathiraja, A. Johnson Santhosh, R. Murali Krishnan, A. Saiyathibrahim, Praveenkumar Vijayakumar, Savita V. Jatti, Ashwini V. Jatti
article en

Abstract

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is a highly favoured route for additive manufacturing of AlSi10Mg alloys; however, the maximum mechanical performance of additively manufactured components relies on tight control of a web of interrelated process variables. This research develops a statistical-metaheuristic hybrid model which optimizes the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of LPBF-fabricated AlSi10Mg within a localized region of the process parameter space. This scientific research was conducted with a limited 3 2 full-factorial experimental design ( n = 9, without replication) that constructed a two-variable quadratic regression model (R 2 = 0.7475, RMSE = 34.57 MPa) between Laser Power ( P ) and Exposure Time ( E ) and tensile response. The Volumetric Energy Density (VED) derived was controlled for out of the model in order to remove the statistical multicollinearity that it brings. Four metaheuristic algorithms (Genetic Algorithm (GA), Simulated Annealing (SA), Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), and JAYA) were then run under a deliberately limited stress test of computational load ( N = 12, Iter max = 100) in MATLAB R2025b. The parameter-dependent solvers, GA and SA, collapsed to an early convergence and all stopped at local optima of 364.30 MPa and 355.59 MPa, respectively. In comparison, JAYA and TLBO, which were parameter-free, found the estimated optimum of 378.74 MPa at P = 350 W and E = 50 µs for the fitted response surface. Two physical experiments that were printed at these settings yielded a real UTS of 380.45 MPa and a prediction error of 0.45%, far less than the 5% engineering threshold. This consensus confirms the regression model and the comparative efficiency of parameter-free algorithms as a valuable proof-of-concept optimization approach within constrained LPBF parameter boundaries.

Discover Materials
University West (SE), Jimma University (ET), Symbiosis International University (IN), KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN), Saveetha University (IN), Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.