Migration policies addressing irregularity: a typology of responses

In the political as well as the academic debate, it often appears as if regularisation or return are the only instruments that states use to address the presence of irregular migrants. Yet in reality, states possess a repertoire of responses to irregularity and select from this repertoire in a situation- and group-specific manner. This article systematically maps out the range of policy responses to the presence of irregular migrants on state territories, categorised as acceptance, toleration and rejection, as well as the rationales policy actors use to justify these responses. Our typology thus helps to move beyond the restrictive-liberal dichotomy, suggesting to explore instead under which circumstances and for which categories states adopt more inclusionary vs. more exclusionary policy approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Migration Studies
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-026-00557-0
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Migration policies addressing irregularity: a typology of responses

Maegan Hendow, Veronika Bilger, Martin Hofmann, Albert Kraler
Comparative Migration Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Migration policies addressing irregularity: a typology of responses

Maegan Hendow, Veronika Bilger, Martin Hofmann, Albert Kraler
article en

Abstract

In the political as well as the academic debate, it often appears as if regularisation or return are the only instruments that states use to address the presence of irregular migrants. Yet in reality, states possess a repertoire of responses to irregularity and select from this repertoire in a situation- and group-specific manner. This article systematically maps out the range of policy responses to the presence of irregular migrants on state territories, categorised as acceptance, toleration and rejection, as well as the rationales policy actors use to justify these responses. Our typology thus helps to move beyond the restrictive-liberal dichotomy, suggesting to explore instead under which circumstances and for which categories states adopt more inclusionary vs. more exclusionary policy approaches.

Comparative Migration Studies
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), International Centre for Migration Policy Development (AT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Migration policies addressing irregularity: a typology of responses — Maegan Hendow, Veronika Bilger, et al. · Comparative Migration Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS