Subsidies as stabilizers: firm-specific risk and political uncertainty

The authors examine the effect of government subsidies on firm-specific risk in a panel of US firms. Both the receipt and magnitude of subsidies significantly reduce idiosyncratic volatility, measured using residuals from the Fama–French three- and five-factor models. To capture heterogeneity, the authors draw on political risk measures from Hassan et al. (2019) and find that firms with heightened political exposure experience the strongest stabilizing effects. Using fixed effects, two-stage least squares regressions, difference-in-differences, nearest neighbor matching and correlated random effects, the authors find consistent evidence that subsidies mitigate rather than amplify firm-specific risk. The results underscore the stabilizing role of public interventions in reducing firm-level vulnerabilities and promoting corporate stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Corporate Finance
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rcf-05-2025-0023
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subsidies as stabilizers: firm-specific risk and political uncertainty

Benjamin Fudali, José Antonio Pérez-Amuedo
Review of Corporate Finance
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Subsidies as stabilizers: firm-specific risk and political uncertainty

Benjamin Fudali, José Antonio Pérez-Amuedo
article en

Abstract

The authors examine the effect of government subsidies on firm-specific risk in a panel of US firms. Both the receipt and magnitude of subsidies significantly reduce idiosyncratic volatility, measured using residuals from the Fama–French three- and five-factor models. To capture heterogeneity, the authors draw on political risk measures from Hassan et al. (2019) and find that firms with heightened political exposure experience the strongest stabilizing effects. Using fixed effects, two-stage least squares regressions, difference-in-differences, nearest neighbor matching and correlated random effects, the authors find consistent evidence that subsidies mitigate rather than amplify firm-specific risk. The results underscore the stabilizing role of public interventions in reducing firm-level vulnerabilities and promoting corporate stability.

Review of Corporate Finance
Marquette University (US), University of New Orleans (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.