What Gets Funded Depends on How Intent Is Translated: Translation Dynamics in Funding Systems (ERC, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Gates Foundation)

This paper examines how funding decisions are shaped by the translation of institutional intent into evaluation criteria and allocation rules. It shows how shifts in interpretation affect what projects are selected, funded, and prioritised over time. The paper analyses translation dynamics within funding systems, highlighting how decision criteria evolve independently of declared purpose. It contributes an empirical perspective on how governance structures shape resource allocation outcomes. This paper contributes to research on evaluation systems, commensuration, and performance-based governance by showing how funding decisions operate on translated representations rather than institutional intent. This paper is part of the Coherence Programme. Further materials and companion papers are available at: https://thecoherenceprogramme.org/

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/h8sv9-gwc36
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Gets Funded Depends on How Intent Is Translated: Translation Dynamics in Funding Systems (ERC, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Gates Foundation)

Robin Edgard Ulrik Mertens
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

What Gets Funded Depends on How Intent Is Translated: Translation Dynamics in Funding Systems (ERC, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Gates Foundation)

Robin Edgard Ulrik Mertens
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how funding decisions are shaped by the translation of institutional intent into evaluation criteria and allocation rules. It shows how shifts in interpretation affect what projects are selected, funded, and prioritised over time. The paper analyses translation dynamics within funding systems, highlighting how decision criteria evolve independently of declared purpose. It contributes an empirical perspective on how governance structures shape resource allocation outcomes. This paper contributes to research on evaluation systems, commensuration, and performance-based governance by showing how funding decisions operate on translated representations rather than institutional intent. This paper is part of the Coherence Programme. Further materials and companion papers are available at: https://thecoherenceprogramme.org/

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Coherent (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Gets Funded Depends on How Intent Is Translated: Translation Dynamics in Funding Systems (ERC, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Gates Foundation) — Robin Edgard Ulrik Mertens · Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS