Validation of the Shoebox PureTest audiometry technology for remote data collection in clinical trials

At present, traditional audiologic assessments are required to be performed in clinics and present a considerable burden to patients and sites (e.g., cost, time), particularly in clinical trials that require numerous longitudinal visits. This study evaluated an iPad-based remote audiometry technology, the Shoebox PureTest, for accuracy and usability, and aimed to determine whether it is fit for use in research and clinical studies. In participants with a wide range of hearing sensitivity, the Shoebox PureTest audiometer was determined to be sufficiently accurate, reliable, and usable, and was statistically equivalent to gold-standard conventional audiometry assessments at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The user experience survey demonstrated that > 80% of users rated the application and usability as 'good', and the overall satisfaction was rated as 'excellent' by 92% of participants. Whilst there are operational considerations for future use in clinical trials, the Shoebox PureTest audiometer has been shown to be a valid alternative to conventional hearing assessments which can be used for the optimization of clinical research studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49550-8
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Shoebox PureTest audiometry technology for remote data collection in clinical trials

Matthew F. Wipperman, Alan R. Shuldiner, Jacek Urbanek, Meghan C. Drummond et al.
Scientific Reports
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Validation of the Shoebox PureTest audiometry technology for remote data collection in clinical trials

Matthew F. Wipperman, Alan R. Shuldiner, Jacek Urbanek, Meghan C. Drummond, Pratyush Rai, Erin Robertson, Emily Redington, Rolando Acosta, Roland Barge, Gannie Tzoneva, Ramzi Majaj
article en

Abstract

At present, traditional audiologic assessments are required to be performed in clinics and present a considerable burden to patients and sites (e.g., cost, time), particularly in clinical trials that require numerous longitudinal visits. This study evaluated an iPad-based remote audiometry technology, the Shoebox PureTest, for accuracy and usability, and aimed to determine whether it is fit for use in research and clinical studies. In participants with a wide range of hearing sensitivity, the Shoebox PureTest audiometer was determined to be sufficiently accurate, reliable, and usable, and was statistically equivalent to gold-standard conventional audiometry assessments at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The user experience survey demonstrated that > 80% of users rated the application and usability as 'good', and the overall satisfaction was rated as 'excellent' by 92% of participants. Whilst there are operational considerations for future use in clinical trials, the Shoebox PureTest audiometer has been shown to be a valid alternative to conventional hearing assessments which can be used for the optimization of clinical research studies.

Scientific Reports
Regeneron (United States) (US)
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of the Shoebox PureTest audiometry technology for remote data collection in clinical trials — Matthew F. Wipperman, Alan R. Shuldiner, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS