Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences

Aphantasia was initially characterised as a pictorial imaginative deficit, but many people with Aphantasia also report having imaginative inabilities for other sensory modalities, such as for imagined sensations of audition, taste, smell, touch, and of body movements. Moreover, patterns of imaginative inability across different types of imagined experience are individually specific to different Aphantasics. Many Aphantasics also report having visual dreams, which has prompted the suggestion that Aphantasia might be an imaginative inability specific to volitional waking imagined sensations. Until now, no study had investigated the multisensory profiles of Aphantasics' dreams, to assess how these might relate to their volitional waking imagined experiences. Here, we make that assessment and find that there is typically a correspondence between the reported multisensory contents of Aphantasics' dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences. However, there is considerable heterogeneity, with tight associations between the reported multisensory content of some Aphantasic's dreams and their volitional waking imagined sensations, and little or no correspondence between the multisensory profiles of imagined sensations across different states of consciousness in other Aphantasics. Our data challenge researchers and theorists of Aphantasia to explain why different Aphantasics report having different contingencies between their volitional waking and dreamt imagined sensations - with one possibility being that neurological differences exist that account for these diverse outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56386-9
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences

Merlin Monzel, Loren Bouyer, Derek H. Arnold
Scientific Reports
Multisensory perception and integration
article

Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences

Merlin Monzel, Loren Bouyer, Derek H. Arnold
article en

Abstract

Aphantasia was initially characterised as a pictorial imaginative deficit, but many people with Aphantasia also report having imaginative inabilities for other sensory modalities, such as for imagined sensations of audition, taste, smell, touch, and of body movements. Moreover, patterns of imaginative inability across different types of imagined experience are individually specific to different Aphantasics. Many Aphantasics also report having visual dreams, which has prompted the suggestion that Aphantasia might be an imaginative inability specific to volitional waking imagined sensations. Until now, no study had investigated the multisensory profiles of Aphantasics' dreams, to assess how these might relate to their volitional waking imagined experiences. Here, we make that assessment and find that there is typically a correspondence between the reported multisensory contents of Aphantasics' dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences. However, there is considerable heterogeneity, with tight associations between the reported multisensory content of some Aphantasic's dreams and their volitional waking imagined sensations, and little or no correspondence between the multisensory profiles of imagined sensations across different states of consciousness in other Aphantasics. Our data challenge researchers and theorists of Aphantasia to explain why different Aphantasics report having different contingencies between their volitional waking and dreamt imagined sensations - with one possibility being that neurological differences exist that account for these diverse outcomes.

Scientific Reports
University of Bonn (DE), The University of Queensland (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences — Merlin Monzel, Loren Bouyer, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS