Physics-constrained Bayesian Inference of Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry data

Magnetic resonance velocimetry provides quantitative three-component three-dimensional velocity data but has poor spatial resolution, poor signal-to-noise ratio, and prohibitively long acquisition times for many applications. When combined with physical knowledge such as conservation of mass, the Navier--Stokes equations, and a constitutive model for the viscosity, however, this data''s high information content can generate super-resolved fields that include unmeasured variables such as the pressure and wall shear stress. This combination is achieved by asserting a physical model, creating a well-posed Bayesian inverse problem with a small search space, and solving it with gradient-based optimization accelerated with adjoint methods. Different physical models can be proposed and the likelihood of each model can be calculated, given the data. With a similar method, the information content of the data can be calculated, given each model. This careful probabilistic representation of uncertainty allows models to be ranked, data quality to be assessed, and future experiments to be designed. We outline the history and principles of this method, provide two toy problems, and show three applications to Magnetic Resonance velocimetry data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.131126
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-constrained Bayesian Inference of Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry data

Matthew P. Juniper, Alexandros Kontogiannis
Apollo
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Physics-constrained Bayesian Inference of Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry data

Matthew P. Juniper, Alexandros Kontogiannis
article en

Abstract

Magnetic resonance velocimetry provides quantitative three-component three-dimensional velocity data but has poor spatial resolution, poor signal-to-noise ratio, and prohibitively long acquisition times for many applications. When combined with physical knowledge such as conservation of mass, the Navier--Stokes equations, and a constitutive model for the viscosity, however, this data''s high information content can generate super-resolved fields that include unmeasured variables such as the pressure and wall shear stress. This combination is achieved by asserting a physical model, creating a well-posed Bayesian inverse problem with a small search space, and solving it with gradient-based optimization accelerated with adjoint methods. Different physical models can be proposed and the likelihood of each model can be calculated, given the data. With a similar method, the information content of the data can be calculated, given each model. This careful probabilistic representation of uncertainty allows models to be ranked, data quality to be assessed, and future experiments to be designed. We outline the history and principles of this method, provide two toy problems, and show three applications to Magnetic Resonance velocimetry data.

Apollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Physics-constrained Bayesian Inference of Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry data — Matthew P. Juniper, Alexandros Kontogiannis · Apollo (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS