Motherhood choice in multiple sclerosis (MoMS) – Pilot trial of web-based decision support

BACKGROUD: Uncertainty concerning motherhood is common among women with multiple sclerosis (wwMS). Therefore, we developed and pre-tested a patient decision aid (PtDA) and a nurse-led decision coaching intervention (DC) to support motherhood choice. The DC includes the PtDA, a decision guide on motherhood choice, and decision coaching. METHODS: We conducted a randomised pilot trial across Germany to test feasibility, with decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale, DCS) as an exploratory endpoint. Initially, we planned a 3:1 randomisation ratio (planned; PtDA = 48, DC = 16). Due to recruitment difficulties, we switched to a 1:1 randomisation ratio to ensure an appropriate sample size (PtDA > 20, DC > 10). Women between 18 and 45 years old with relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome, and who had not yet decided about motherhood, were eligible. We recruited two nurses for our decision coaching training course. We used questionnaires to measure decisional conflict, programme feasibility, knowledge, and worries regarding pregnancy in MS. Interviews were conducted to gain in-depth information on the potential feasibility of the programmes. Interviews were analysed thematically and questionnaires descriptively. We conducted explorative group comparisons and merged findings using joint display analysis. RESULTS: We trained two decision coaches in the DC group and recruited 35 wwMS (PtDA = 22; DC = 13) over five months. Median DCS scores in the DC group were 49 at baseline and 15 at follow-up (range 0-100; higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict). In the PtDA group, scores were 54 (baseline) and 31 (follow-up). Explorative group comparison indicated lower decisional conflict at follow-up in the DC group than in the PtDA group (p = 0.035). Interviewees (PtDA = 5; DC = 6; nurses = 2) described both interventions as helpful for decision-making. Qualitative findings indicate greater satisfaction levels in the DC group. CONCLUSION: Both interventions appear useful for wwMS in making motherhood choices. The DC programme seems more promising in supporting decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS); DRKS00038534.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351108
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motherhood choice in multiple sclerosis (MoMS) – Pilot trial of web-based decision support

Sascha Köpke, Kerstin Hellwig, Julia Hickstein, Christoph Heesen et al.
PLoS ONE
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Motherhood choice in multiple sclerosis (MoMS) – Pilot trial of web-based decision support

Sascha Köpke, Kerstin Hellwig, Julia Hickstein, Christoph Heesen, Lara S. Stahl, Anne C. Rahn
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUD: Uncertainty concerning motherhood is common among women with multiple sclerosis (wwMS). Therefore, we developed and pre-tested a patient decision aid (PtDA) and a nurse-led decision coaching intervention (DC) to support motherhood choice. The DC includes the PtDA, a decision guide on motherhood choice, and decision coaching. METHODS: We conducted a randomised pilot trial across Germany to test feasibility, with decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale, DCS) as an exploratory endpoint. Initially, we planned a 3:1 randomisation ratio (planned; PtDA = 48, DC = 16). Due to recruitment difficulties, we switched to a 1:1 randomisation ratio to ensure an appropriate sample size (PtDA > 20, DC > 10). Women between 18 and 45 years old with relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome, and who had not yet decided about motherhood, were eligible. We recruited two nurses for our decision coaching training course. We used questionnaires to measure decisional conflict, programme feasibility, knowledge, and worries regarding pregnancy in MS. Interviews were conducted to gain in-depth information on the potential feasibility of the programmes. Interviews were analysed thematically and questionnaires descriptively. We conducted explorative group comparisons and merged findings using joint display analysis. RESULTS: We trained two decision coaches in the DC group and recruited 35 wwMS (PtDA = 22; DC = 13) over five months. Median DCS scores in the DC group were 49 at baseline and 15 at follow-up (range 0-100; higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict). In the PtDA group, scores were 54 (baseline) and 31 (follow-up). Explorative group comparison indicated lower decisional conflict at follow-up in the DC group than in the PtDA group (p = 0.035). Interviewees (PtDA = 5; DC = 6; nurses = 2) described both interventions as helpful for decision-making. Qualitative findings indicate greater satisfaction levels in the DC group. CONCLUSION: Both interventions appear useful for wwMS in making motherhood choices. The DC programme seems more promising in supporting decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS); DRKS00038534.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), St. Josef-Hospital (DE), Institute of Neuroimmunology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Biogen, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Multiple Sclerosis Society, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutschen Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.