Connections between science and care within public and global health research: the need for attention and action

Connections between science and care are common, such as when people access particular therapies through participating in research. However, interactions go far beyond medical treatment per se, with other kinds of advice and support (including direct financial support) also warranting consideration. Such complexities of the science-care relationship are often not fully accounted for by formal ethical and governance processes and approvals. This can result in morally justifiable action, while also engendering uncertainty and unease among research teams. Acts that are ostensibly caring can on occasion and inadvertently also be harmful (e.g. the informal circulation of contested health-related claims or even 'misinformation' by research team members). Here, we argue that the connections between science and care require more dedicated attention from across the research ecosystem. This includes from funders, whose conventions can inappropriately restrict the care that researchers could and should provide. We also indicate the need for further studies by social scientists into how public and global health researchers navigate challenges related to care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Health
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.03017
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connections between science and care within public and global health research: the need for attention and action

Miranda R. Waggoner, Anna Chiumento, Catherine J Crompton, Sue Fletcher‐Watson et al.
Journal of Global Health
Global Health and Surgery
article

Connections between science and care within public and global health research: the need for attention and action

Miranda R. Waggoner, Anna Chiumento, Catherine J Crompton, Sue Fletcher‐Watson, Felicity V. Mehendale, Rosie Stenhouse, T Jackson, T S Shi, Sarah Wild, Charlotte Hanlon, Martyn Pickersgill, Harry Campbell, Cathy Abbott
article en

Abstract

Connections between science and care are common, such as when people access particular therapies through participating in research. However, interactions go far beyond medical treatment per se, with other kinds of advice and support (including direct financial support) also warranting consideration. Such complexities of the science-care relationship are often not fully accounted for by formal ethical and governance processes and approvals. This can result in morally justifiable action, while also engendering uncertainty and unease among research teams. Acts that are ostensibly caring can on occasion and inadvertently also be harmful (e.g. the informal circulation of contested health-related claims or even 'misinformation' by research team members). Here, we argue that the connections between science and care require more dedicated attention from across the research ecosystem. This includes from funders, whose conventions can inappropriately restrict the care that researchers could and should provide. We also indicate the need for further studies by social scientists into how public and global health researchers navigate challenges related to care.

Journal of Global HealthVol. 16
Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB), Rice University (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.