Hidden Codes: Exploring Implicit Bias Within Ethical Codes for Substance Use Counseling

ABSTRACT Counseling codes of ethics play a central role in shaping substance use disorder (SUD) counseling practice; however, these codes may also embed implicit biases that influence how counselors conceptualize clients, recovery, and professional legitimacy. Drawing on critical discourse analysis, this study examines how language and omissions within counseling ethical codes shape stigma toward counselors with lived experience, reinforce racialized narratives of substance use, and sustain structural divisions between addiction and mental health care. Findings reveal that these codes reinforce stigma against SUD counselors with lived experience, maintain the separation of SUD and mental health treatment, and perpetuate racialized narratives that disadvantage minoritized communities. The study calls for revising ethical guidelines to promote equity, cultural humility, and inclusive practices in SUD counseling, ensuring more just and effective care for diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaoc.70016
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden Codes: Exploring Implicit Bias Within Ethical Codes for Substance Use Counseling

Jennifer Rio, Amelia Evans, George Stoupas, Aaron S. Hymes et al.
Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Hidden Codes: Exploring Implicit Bias Within Ethical Codes for Substance Use Counseling

Jennifer Rio, Amelia Evans, George Stoupas, Aaron S. Hymes, Yuhyun Park, Frank B. Gorritz FitzSimons, Brittany Sager‐Heinrichs
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Counseling codes of ethics play a central role in shaping substance use disorder (SUD) counseling practice; however, these codes may also embed implicit biases that influence how counselors conceptualize clients, recovery, and professional legitimacy. Drawing on critical discourse analysis, this study examines how language and omissions within counseling ethical codes shape stigma toward counselors with lived experience, reinforce racialized narratives of substance use, and sustain structural divisions between addiction and mental health care. Findings reveal that these codes reinforce stigma against SUD counselors with lived experience, maintain the separation of SUD and mental health treatment, and perpetuate racialized narratives that disadvantage minoritized communities. The study calls for revising ethical guidelines to promote equity, cultural humility, and inclusive practices in SUD counseling, ensuring more just and effective care for diverse populations.

Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling
Shenandoah University (US), Lindsey Wilson College (US), Hazelden Betty Ford Graduate School of Addiction Studies (US), Wake Forest University (US), Milligan College (US), Auburn University (US), Bethel University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hidden Codes: Exploring Implicit Bias Within Ethical Codes for Substance Use Counseling — Jennifer Rio, Amelia Evans, et al. · Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS