To release or not to release? A call for caution when considering wildlife reintroductions

Abstract In a global scenario of biodiversity loss, apex predators and large obligate scavengers are common targets of conservation efforts. Management agencies typically focus on individual species and on immediate actions, seemingly neglecting the holistic and long‐term scope that lies at the very core of conservation biology. Conservation actions such as captive breeding and the eventual release of individuals can help species at the brink of extinction to recover. However, they sometimes seem to be the ultimate goal, regardless of the conservation status of the species and bypassing the need to pursue long‐term ecosystem recovery. Minimizing the factors that drove species to a threatened status and assessing the ecological and societal impacts of reintroductions should be crucial steps before assuming that reintroductions are a priority. We discuss these issues based on ongoing management programs of several species in the Iberian Peninsula. We propose complementary actions that would promote the recovery of species and, ultimately, ecosystem resilience in the long term. Our concerns may prove useful for many other species and ecosystems on a global scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70337
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To release or not to release? A call for caution when considering wildlife reintroductions

Héctor Ruiz‐Villar, Andrés Ordiz, José María Gil‐Sánchez, David Álvarez
Conservation Science and Practice
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

To release or not to release? A call for caution when considering wildlife reintroductions

Héctor Ruiz‐Villar, Andrés Ordiz, José María Gil‐Sánchez, David Álvarez
article en

Abstract

Abstract In a global scenario of biodiversity loss, apex predators and large obligate scavengers are common targets of conservation efforts. Management agencies typically focus on individual species and on immediate actions, seemingly neglecting the holistic and long‐term scope that lies at the very core of conservation biology. Conservation actions such as captive breeding and the eventual release of individuals can help species at the brink of extinction to recover. However, they sometimes seem to be the ultimate goal, regardless of the conservation status of the species and bypassing the need to pursue long‐term ecosystem recovery. Minimizing the factors that drove species to a threatened status and assessing the ecological and societal impacts of reintroductions should be crucial steps before assuming that reintroductions are a priority. We discuss these issues based on ongoing management programs of several species in the Iberian Peninsula. We propose complementary actions that would promote the recovery of species and, ultimately, ecosystem resilience in the long term. Our concerns may prove useful for many other species and ecosystems on a global scale.

Conservation Science and Practice
Universidad de Oviedo (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To release or not to release? A call for caution when considering wildlife reintroductions — Héctor Ruiz‐Villar, Andrés Ordiz, et al. · Conservation Science and Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS