Role of Institutionalization in Interoception, Emotion Regulation, and Prosocial Behavior in Preschool Children

Background/Objectives: Although early institutionalization has been linked to socioemotional difficulties, its relationship with interoception in early childhood remains unclear. This study examined differences in interoception, emotion regulation, and prosocial behavior between institutionalized preschool children (IPC) and noninstitutionalized preschool children (NIPC) and explored the associations among these domains. Methods: In total, 51 children aged 4–6 years (26 IPC, 25 NIPC) participated in this study. Interoceptive accuracy (IAc) was assessed using an adapted Jumping Jack Paradigm that combined subjective reports and objective heart rate measures. Interoceptive sensitivity was evaluated using the iBEAT task based on gaze duration toward synchronous and asynchronous stimuli. Cooperation was measured using a joint fishing task, and emotion regulation was assessed using a delayed gratification task and the Early Emotion Regulation Behavior Questionnaire. Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Regression analyses were performed to explore the associations among variables. Results: Both groups had IAc values close to zero, indicating overall correspondence between subjective and objective signals. However, IPC showed more negative values, indicating underestimation, whereas NIPC showed more positive values, indicating overestimation. No significant differences in interoceptive sensitivity were found, and no evidence of discrimination between synchronous and asynchronous stimuli emerged. Compared with the IPC, the NIPC exhibited greater cooperation. No group differences were found in inhibitory control, although differences were observed in specific emotion regulation strategies. Regression analyses indicated that institutionalization and interoceptive sensitivity predicted IAc, whereas emotion regulation strategies and synchronous preference predicted cooperation. Conclusions: The results suggest that early institutionalization may induce changes in interoception, emotion regulation, and cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16060630
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Institutionalization in Interoception, Emotion Regulation, and Prosocial Behavior in Preschool Children

Marisol Correa, Eduar Herrera, Zamara Cuadros, María José Escobar-Falla
Brain Sciences
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Role of Institutionalization in Interoception, Emotion Regulation, and Prosocial Behavior in Preschool Children

Marisol Correa, Eduar Herrera, Zamara Cuadros, María José Escobar-Falla
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Although early institutionalization has been linked to socioemotional difficulties, its relationship with interoception in early childhood remains unclear. This study examined differences in interoception, emotion regulation, and prosocial behavior between institutionalized preschool children (IPC) and noninstitutionalized preschool children (NIPC) and explored the associations among these domains. Methods: In total, 51 children aged 4–6 years (26 IPC, 25 NIPC) participated in this study. Interoceptive accuracy (IAc) was assessed using an adapted Jumping Jack Paradigm that combined subjective reports and objective heart rate measures. Interoceptive sensitivity was evaluated using the iBEAT task based on gaze duration toward synchronous and asynchronous stimuli. Cooperation was measured using a joint fishing task, and emotion regulation was assessed using a delayed gratification task and the Early Emotion Regulation Behavior Questionnaire. Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Regression analyses were performed to explore the associations among variables. Results: Both groups had IAc values close to zero, indicating overall correspondence between subjective and objective signals. However, IPC showed more negative values, indicating underestimation, whereas NIPC showed more positive values, indicating overestimation. No significant differences in interoceptive sensitivity were found, and no evidence of discrimination between synchronous and asynchronous stimuli emerged. Compared with the IPC, the NIPC exhibited greater cooperation. No group differences were found in inhibitory control, although differences were observed in specific emotion regulation strategies. Regression analyses indicated that institutionalization and interoceptive sensitivity predicted IAc, whereas emotion regulation strategies and synchronous preference predicted cooperation. Conclusions: The results suggest that early institutionalization may induce changes in interoception, emotion regulation, and cooperation.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(6)
Icesi University (CO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.