Hormonal therapy or chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer? A mixed-methods study assessing physicians’ attitudes

PURPOSE: Hormonal therapy and chemotherapy are common systemic therapy options in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. There is limited consensus on factors that affect therapy selection. This study aims to gain insight into those factors at the level of clinical decision-making and at the level of patient- and tumor-specific factors. METHODS: We performed an international cross-sectional study among medical oncologists and gynecologists. The survey consisted of (1) statements about barriers and facilitators that affect the process of decision-making and (2) hypothetical vignette cases investigating three patients and tumor factors that were tested with three levels each. Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: 167 physicians responded to the survey. The most important facilitating factors were: understanding the patient's personal context and the role of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. The most important barrier was the lack of evidence for prediction of response to hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. The three patient and tumor factors included in the vignette cases were severity of symptoms, performance status, and progesterone-receptor (PR) expression in the tumor. PR expression and performance status were most discriminative, with high PR expression and poor performance status favoring hormonal therapy. CONCLUSION: The provision of personalized care in palliative treatment of endometrial cancer can be improved by multidisciplinary tumor board discussions with the personal context and preference of the patient in mind. The patient factors, severity of symptoms and WHO performance status, and the tumor factor, PR tumor expression, were most relevant for selecting hormonal therapy or chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-026-08486-0
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hormonal therapy or chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer? A mixed-methods study assessing physicians’ attitudes

Johanna W. M. Aarts, Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg, Willem Jan van Weelden, Julia Mesu et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Hormonal therapy or chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer? A mixed-methods study assessing physicians’ attitudes

Johanna W. M. Aarts, Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg, Willem Jan van Weelden, Julia Mesu, Petronella B. Ottevanger
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hormonal therapy and chemotherapy are common systemic therapy options in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. There is limited consensus on factors that affect therapy selection. This study aims to gain insight into those factors at the level of clinical decision-making and at the level of patient- and tumor-specific factors. METHODS: We performed an international cross-sectional study among medical oncologists and gynecologists. The survey consisted of (1) statements about barriers and facilitators that affect the process of decision-making and (2) hypothetical vignette cases investigating three patients and tumor factors that were tested with three levels each. Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: 167 physicians responded to the survey. The most important facilitating factors were: understanding the patient's personal context and the role of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. The most important barrier was the lack of evidence for prediction of response to hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. The three patient and tumor factors included in the vignette cases were severity of symptoms, performance status, and progesterone-receptor (PR) expression in the tumor. PR expression and performance status were most discriminative, with high PR expression and poor performance status favoring hormonal therapy. CONCLUSION: The provision of personalized care in palliative treatment of endometrial cancer can be improved by multidisciplinary tumor board discussions with the personal context and preference of the patient in mind. The patient factors, severity of symptoms and WHO performance status, and the tumor factor, PR tumor expression, were most relevant for selecting hormonal therapy or chemotherapy.

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.