Linguistic and psychometric validation of a German version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP GER): results of a study with intensive care nurses

BACKGROUND: Moral distress is an increasingly studied phenomenon in nursing science and ethics. It refers to the psychological discomfort experienced when an individual is prevented from acting on a course of action that they recognize as ethically correct. Nurses who work in intensive care are at high risk of experiencing moral distress. Various instruments to assess moral distress, most recently Epstein et al.'s measure of moral distress for health care professionals (MMD-HP), have been developed. At present, there is no validated German language version of the instrument for assessing moral distress in Germany. Therefore, this study aimed, at (1) translating and linguistically validating the instrument, as well as (2) psychometrically validating it among intensive care nurses in Germany. METHODS: According to the ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research) guidelines, the MMD‑HP was translated, linguistically validated, and psychometrically tested. The German version of the moral distress thermometer (MDT) and the German Nursing Workload Scale (NWS) were used to measure the construct validity of the translated instrument. Institutional ethics review boards of two universities approved the study protocols. RESULTS: A total of 187 questionnaires of intensive care nurses remained for analysis after listwise deletion. The mean sum‑score was 106.9 (± 62) (minimum = 3, maximum = 325; range = 0-400). Criterion validity was supported by a high positive correlation between the German version of the MMD‑HP and the validated German-language moral distress thermometer (ρ = 0.598, p = 0.001, n = 168). Factor analyses revealed a four‑factor solution with correlating factors for the German version. The instrument showed high reliability (ωH = 0.91, 95 % CI = 0.88-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the German adaptation of the MMD-HP shows potential for measuring moral distress among intensive care nurses in Germany. In addition, its psychometric properties preliminarily support its reliability and validity in this cultural context. Further independent validation studies are needed to provide support for the proposed four-factor model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01522-3
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic and psychometric validation of a German version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP GER): results of a study with intensive care nurses

Christiane Kugler, Katja Kuehlmeyer, Susanne Weber, Sadhbh Byrne et al.
BMC Medical Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
article

Linguistic and psychometric validation of a German version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP GER): results of a study with intensive care nurses

Christiane Kugler, Katja Kuehlmeyer, Susanne Weber, Sadhbh Byrne, Larissa Forster, Hannah Spielmann-Burkard, Madeleine von Strachwitz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Moral distress is an increasingly studied phenomenon in nursing science and ethics. It refers to the psychological discomfort experienced when an individual is prevented from acting on a course of action that they recognize as ethically correct. Nurses who work in intensive care are at high risk of experiencing moral distress. Various instruments to assess moral distress, most recently Epstein et al.'s measure of moral distress for health care professionals (MMD-HP), have been developed. At present, there is no validated German language version of the instrument for assessing moral distress in Germany. Therefore, this study aimed, at (1) translating and linguistically validating the instrument, as well as (2) psychometrically validating it among intensive care nurses in Germany. METHODS: According to the ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research) guidelines, the MMD‑HP was translated, linguistically validated, and psychometrically tested. The German version of the moral distress thermometer (MDT) and the German Nursing Workload Scale (NWS) were used to measure the construct validity of the translated instrument. Institutional ethics review boards of two universities approved the study protocols. RESULTS: A total of 187 questionnaires of intensive care nurses remained for analysis after listwise deletion. The mean sum‑score was 106.9 (± 62) (minimum = 3, maximum = 325; range = 0-400). Criterion validity was supported by a high positive correlation between the German version of the MMD‑HP and the validated German-language moral distress thermometer (ρ = 0.598, p = 0.001, n = 168). Factor analyses revealed a four‑factor solution with correlating factors for the German version. The instrument showed high reliability (ωH = 0.91, 95 % CI = 0.88-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the German adaptation of the MMD-HP shows potential for measuring moral distress among intensive care nurses in Germany. In addition, its psychometric properties preliminarily support its reliability and validity in this cultural context. Further independent validation studies are needed to provide support for the proposed four-factor model.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 27(1)
University of Freiburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.