Clinical characteristics of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in breast cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid versus denosumab: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide, and bone-targeting agents (BTAs) - particularly zoledronic acid and denosumab - are widely administered for bone metastasis, carrying a recognized risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) with reported incidence rates of 1-15% in oncologic populations. Drug-dependent differences in MRONJ characteristics, anatomical distribution, and the causal role of dentoalveolar procedures remain incompletely characterized in breast cancer patients. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 101 breast cancer patients diagnosed with MRONJ per 2022 AAOMS criteria, who received zoledronic acid (n = 66) or denosumab (n = 35) exclusively at this institution between January 2009 and December 2025. All diagnoses were confirmed by a single board-certified oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Cumulative BTA dose count at MRONJ onset did not differ significantly between groups (mean 38.9 vs. 25.7; p = 0.076). The denosumab group developed MRONJ at an older mean age than the zoledronic acid group (59.5 vs. 55.7 years; p = 0.013). A significant drug-dependent anatomical difference was observed: mandibular predominance in the zoledronic acid group (59.1%) versus maxillary predominance in the denosumab group (54.3%; p = 0.015). The majority of patients developed MRONJ without prior dentoalveolar procedures (53.0% zoledronic acid; 65.7% denosumab). Periodontal disease prevalence was comparable between groups (60.5%; p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Cumulative injection count alone does not reliably predict MRONJ onset in oncologic populations. The majority of cases arose without prior dentoalveolar procedures, challenging the paradigm of tooth extraction as the primary causative trigger. A drug-dependent MRONJ predilection in jaws- mandibular in zoledronic acid users, maxillary in denosumab users - warrants validation in larger prospective cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-026-00516-w
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical characteristics of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in breast cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid versus denosumab: a retrospective cohort study

Jin Seok Kim, Yoojeong Hwang, SeungHun Baek, Kang-Min Ahn
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Bone health and treatments
article

Clinical characteristics of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in breast cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid versus denosumab: a retrospective cohort study

Jin Seok Kim, Yoojeong Hwang, SeungHun Baek, Kang-Min Ahn
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide, and bone-targeting agents (BTAs) - particularly zoledronic acid and denosumab - are widely administered for bone metastasis, carrying a recognized risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) with reported incidence rates of 1-15% in oncologic populations. Drug-dependent differences in MRONJ characteristics, anatomical distribution, and the causal role of dentoalveolar procedures remain incompletely characterized in breast cancer patients. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 101 breast cancer patients diagnosed with MRONJ per 2022 AAOMS criteria, who received zoledronic acid (n = 66) or denosumab (n = 35) exclusively at this institution between January 2009 and December 2025. All diagnoses were confirmed by a single board-certified oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Cumulative BTA dose count at MRONJ onset did not differ significantly between groups (mean 38.9 vs. 25.7; p = 0.076). The denosumab group developed MRONJ at an older mean age than the zoledronic acid group (59.5 vs. 55.7 years; p = 0.013). A significant drug-dependent anatomical difference was observed: mandibular predominance in the zoledronic acid group (59.1%) versus maxillary predominance in the denosumab group (54.3%; p = 0.015). The majority of patients developed MRONJ without prior dentoalveolar procedures (53.0% zoledronic acid; 65.7% denosumab). Periodontal disease prevalence was comparable between groups (60.5%; p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Cumulative injection count alone does not reliably predict MRONJ onset in oncologic populations. The majority of cases arose without prior dentoalveolar procedures, challenging the paradigm of tooth extraction as the primary causative trigger. A drug-dependent MRONJ predilection in jaws- mandibular in zoledronic acid users, maxillary in denosumab users - warrants validation in larger prospective cohorts.

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Brown University (US), University of Ulsan (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.