Well-constrained LDA and SVM classification of ERT/IP data for leachate mapping in urban landfills

Landfill leachate represents a major environmental concern due to its potential to contaminate groundwater. Geophysical methods such as electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization are widely used to characterize landfill interiors and infer leachate plumes, as leachate typically shows distinct resistivity and chargeability relative to surrounding waste and natural soils. However, the interpretation of geophysical data is still largely qualitative or semi-quantitative, often leading to ambiguous results. To overcome these limitations, we propose a supervised machine-learning framework based on Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), trained using resistivity (ρ), chargeability (m), and normalized chargeability (Mn) derived from well data. The classifiers applied to the full geophysical models obtain spatially continuous maps of leachate occurrence. Benchmark models (Logistic Regression and Random Forest) were tested to assess the role of model complexity under sparse training conditions. The results highlight the complementary strengths of LDA and SVM: LDA systematically achieves perfect recall (100%), providing a more inclusive reconstruction of leachate-affected zones, whereas SVM attains perfect precision (100%), enabling a more conservative delineation of leachate accumulations. In the three-parameter space (ρ, m, Mn), selected for both physical completeness and comparability with previous studies, both methods reach 95% accuracy, with F1-scores of 89% (LDA) and 86% (SVM), while Random Forest shows results comparable with SVM, and Logistic Regression yields lower performances. Overall, the proposed approach bridges the gap between point-scale well information and volumetric geophysical imaging, providing a more objective, reproducible, and operational tool for leachate mapping in complex urban landfills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115630
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Well-constrained LDA and SVM classification of ERT/IP data for leachate mapping in urban landfills

Davide Melegari, Ester Piegari, Giorgio De Donno
Waste Management
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Well-constrained LDA and SVM classification of ERT/IP data for leachate mapping in urban landfills

Davide Melegari, Ester Piegari, Giorgio De Donno
article en

Abstract

Landfill leachate represents a major environmental concern due to its potential to contaminate groundwater. Geophysical methods such as electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization are widely used to characterize landfill interiors and infer leachate plumes, as leachate typically shows distinct resistivity and chargeability relative to surrounding waste and natural soils. However, the interpretation of geophysical data is still largely qualitative or semi-quantitative, often leading to ambiguous results. To overcome these limitations, we propose a supervised machine-learning framework based on Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), trained using resistivity (ρ), chargeability (m), and normalized chargeability (Mn) derived from well data. The classifiers applied to the full geophysical models obtain spatially continuous maps of leachate occurrence. Benchmark models (Logistic Regression and Random Forest) were tested to assess the role of model complexity under sparse training conditions. The results highlight the complementary strengths of LDA and SVM: LDA systematically achieves perfect recall (100%), providing a more inclusive reconstruction of leachate-affected zones, whereas SVM attains perfect precision (100%), enabling a more conservative delineation of leachate accumulations. In the three-parameter space (ρ, m, Mn), selected for both physical completeness and comparability with previous studies, both methods reach 95% accuracy, with F1-scores of 89% (LDA) and 86% (SVM), while Random Forest shows results comparable with SVM, and Logistic Regression yields lower performances. Overall, the proposed approach bridges the gap between point-scale well information and volumetric geophysical imaging, providing a more objective, reproducible, and operational tool for leachate mapping in complex urban landfills.

Waste ManagementVol. 222
University of Naples Federico II (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.