Storage and the Economics of Commodity Price Stabilization

This review reassesses the economics of commodity price stabilization policies through the lens of the rational expectations storage model. In frictionless markets, private speculative storage efficiently smooths commodity prices; thus, welfare gains from public intervention require the presence of market or endowment failures, which are prevalent in agricultural markets in low-income settings. Optimal state–contingent stabilization policies raise welfare but are complex, crowd out private storage, and are difficult to design and implement. Simple rules—notably narrow price bands or storage-cost subsidies—offer more feasible approximations, with subsidies being more efficient. In open economies with high trade costs, storage can mitigate price troughs. Conversely, export controls can mitigate domestic transmission of global price spikes but are non-cooperative. Although storage policies stabilize prices, their welfare effects are nuanced. They entail large redistributive transfers that far exceed efficiency gains; accordingly, they should be viewed as second-best instruments, valuable when better-targeted alternatives are unavailable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Resource Economics
Published
2026-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-112624-121752
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Storage and the Economics of Commodity Price Stabilization

Brian D. Wright, Christophe Gouel
Annual Review of Resource Economics
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Storage and the Economics of Commodity Price Stabilization

Brian D. Wright, Christophe Gouel
article en

Abstract

This review reassesses the economics of commodity price stabilization policies through the lens of the rational expectations storage model. In frictionless markets, private speculative storage efficiently smooths commodity prices; thus, welfare gains from public intervention require the presence of market or endowment failures, which are prevalent in agricultural markets in low-income settings. Optimal state–contingent stabilization policies raise welfare but are complex, crowd out private storage, and are difficult to design and implement. Simple rules—notably narrow price bands or storage-cost subsidies—offer more feasible approximations, with subsidies being more efficient. In open economies with high trade costs, storage can mitigate price troughs. Conversely, export controls can mitigate domestic transmission of global price spikes but are non-cooperative. Although storage policies stabilize prices, their welfare effects are nuanced. They entail large redistributive transfers that far exceed efficiency gains; accordingly, they should be viewed as second-best instruments, valuable when better-targeted alternatives are unavailable.

Annual Review of Resource Economics
AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.