A performance-based classification framework for standardising FA/GGBFS geopolymer binder systems

Abstract The necessity of reducing CO₂ emissions resulting from cement production has increased the demand for supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). However, the widespread adoption of these materials has remained limited due to variability in quality, inconsistency in supply, and a lack of standardized performance specifications. Alkali-activated geopolymer binders derived from FA and GGBFS have shown mechanical performance and durability superior to, ordinary Portland cement (OPC). This behaviour is attributed to the formation of two gel phases (N A S H and C (A) S H) depending on the calcium content of the raw material. However, no standardized classification or performance-based design framework was established for these materials within current codes and regulations. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic review of published literature (2010–2025) was conducted. Four key factors governing 28-day compressive strength were identified: FA/GGBFS ratio, NaOH molarity (8–14 M), SS/SH ratio (1.5–2.5), and water to binder ratio (0.35–0.45). Quantitative relationships were established between mix design variables and engineering performance. Under ambient curing conditions, binary geopolymer concrete composed of FA/GGBFS achieved compressive strengths ranging from 45 to 85 MPa. Based on these results, a five-tier performance classification framework (GPC I to GPC V) was proposed. This framework correlates the chemical composition of the raw materials, the predominant gel type, the strength class, and the durability class (DC 1 to DC 5). This framework was expanded to provide preliminary guidelines for mix design and performance classification. The results demonstrated the potential to integrate FA/GGBFS geopolymers into broader standardization strategies for the construction materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Materials
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-026-00929-4
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A performance-based classification framework for standardising FA/GGBFS geopolymer binder systems

F. E. Hanash, Ibrahim Alameri, Salam R. Armoosh
Discover Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

A performance-based classification framework for standardising FA/GGBFS geopolymer binder systems

F. E. Hanash, Ibrahim Alameri, Salam R. Armoosh
article en

Abstract

Abstract The necessity of reducing CO₂ emissions resulting from cement production has increased the demand for supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). However, the widespread adoption of these materials has remained limited due to variability in quality, inconsistency in supply, and a lack of standardized performance specifications. Alkali-activated geopolymer binders derived from FA and GGBFS have shown mechanical performance and durability superior to, ordinary Portland cement (OPC). This behaviour is attributed to the formation of two gel phases (N A S H and C (A) S H) depending on the calcium content of the raw material. However, no standardized classification or performance-based design framework was established for these materials within current codes and regulations. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic review of published literature (2010–2025) was conducted. Four key factors governing 28-day compressive strength were identified: FA/GGBFS ratio, NaOH molarity (8–14 M), SS/SH ratio (1.5–2.5), and water to binder ratio (0.35–0.45). Quantitative relationships were established between mix design variables and engineering performance. Under ambient curing conditions, binary geopolymer concrete composed of FA/GGBFS achieved compressive strengths ranging from 45 to 85 MPa. Based on these results, a five-tier performance classification framework (GPC I to GPC V) was proposed. This framework correlates the chemical composition of the raw materials, the predominant gel type, the strength class, and the durability class (DC 1 to DC 5). This framework was expanded to provide preliminary guidelines for mix design and performance classification. The results demonstrated the potential to integrate FA/GGBFS geopolymers into broader standardization strategies for the construction materials.

Discover Materials
Sana'a University (YE), University of Anbar (IQ), Saba University (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.