Wearable Myoelectric Interface for Neurorehabilitation (MINT) to Recover Arm Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Abnormal muscle co-activation impairs arm function after stroke. Home-based myoelectric interface for neurorehabilitation (MINT) was developed to reduce abnormal co-activation. Objective: Evaluate MINT feasibility and effects on arm activity in a single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Methods: Moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke survivors were randomized to 1 of 3 MINT groups (who played customized games requiring independent activation of 2 or 3 abnormally co-activating muscles) or a sham control group (using 1 muscle). Participants trained 90 minutes/day, 6 days/week, switching upper-arm muscle sets every 2 to 3 weeks. Feasibility was assessed using training time, repetitions, and motivation. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) from baseline to week 6 in each MINT group compared to sham. Secondary outcomes included WMFT at week 10, WMFT subscores, Fugl–Meyer, Modified Ashworth, Motor Activity Log, reaching kinematics, co-activation, and lesion location effects. Results: Fifty-nine participants completed training (mean: 86 ± 21 minutes/day, 315 ± 85 repetitions/day). The 3-muscle group improved WMFT by 6.8 seconds at week 6 (95% confidence interval [2.1-11.6 seconds], P = .001); other groups did not. Combined MINT groups improved by 4.1 seconds ([1.4-6.8 seconds], P = .0008). In per-protocol analysis, the 3-muscle group improved significantly more than sham on WMFT (7.5 seconds; [0.1-14.9 seconds], P = .046), shoulder/elbow subscores, and kinematics. At week 10, all MINT groups improved significantly, unlike sham. Reduced co-activation correlated significantly with improved arm function and movement. Stroke involving the internal capsule negatively predicted MINT response. Other secondary outcomes showed no clinically important changes. Discussion: MINT conditioning is feasible, reduces co-activation, and improves arm movement and activity. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03401762).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683261454937
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wearable Myoelectric Interface for Neurorehabilitation (MINT) to Recover Arm Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Alix Jampol, Goran Tomic, Cynthia Gorski, S H Park et al.
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Wearable Myoelectric Interface for Neurorehabilitation (MINT) to Recover Arm Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Alix Jampol, Goran Tomic, Cynthia Gorski, S H Park, 서강, Pooja Patel, Richard L. Harvey, Jinsook Roh, P. Prakash, Abed Khorasani, Marc W. Slutzky, Anya Chappel, Na‐Teng Hung, Vivek Paul, Erin King, Ethan J. Houskamp, Joel Hulsizer, Jungwha Julia Lee, Jessica Lanis, Megan Hunzeker, Rachel Galant, Catherine Gallagher, Grace Rucker
article en

Abstract

Background: Abnormal muscle co-activation impairs arm function after stroke. Home-based myoelectric interface for neurorehabilitation (MINT) was developed to reduce abnormal co-activation. Objective: Evaluate MINT feasibility and effects on arm activity in a single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Methods: Moderately-to-severely impaired chronic stroke survivors were randomized to 1 of 3 MINT groups (who played customized games requiring independent activation of 2 or 3 abnormally co-activating muscles) or a sham control group (using 1 muscle). Participants trained 90 minutes/day, 6 days/week, switching upper-arm muscle sets every 2 to 3 weeks. Feasibility was assessed using training time, repetitions, and motivation. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) from baseline to week 6 in each MINT group compared to sham. Secondary outcomes included WMFT at week 10, WMFT subscores, Fugl–Meyer, Modified Ashworth, Motor Activity Log, reaching kinematics, co-activation, and lesion location effects. Results: Fifty-nine participants completed training (mean: 86 ± 21 minutes/day, 315 ± 85 repetitions/day). The 3-muscle group improved WMFT by 6.8 seconds at week 6 (95% confidence interval [2.1-11.6 seconds], P = .001); other groups did not. Combined MINT groups improved by 4.1 seconds ([1.4-6.8 seconds], P = .0008). In per-protocol analysis, the 3-muscle group improved significantly more than sham on WMFT (7.5 seconds; [0.1-14.9 seconds], P = .046), shoulder/elbow subscores, and kinematics. At week 10, all MINT groups improved significantly, unlike sham. Reduced co-activation correlated significantly with improved arm function and movement. Stroke involving the internal capsule negatively predicted MINT response. Other secondary outcomes showed no clinically important changes. Discussion: MINT conditioning is feasible, reduces co-activation, and improves arm movement and activity. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03401762).

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Northwestern University (US), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US), Northwestern Medicine (US), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.